🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.sys.powerpc
Article #2772

Re: Debate: PowerMac "trounces" Pentium....???

#2772
From: David E. Konerding
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 1996 08:29
52 lines
2976 bytes
On Fri, 12 Jan 1996 20:25:38 -0500, Damir Smitlener  <damir@mindspring.com> wrote:
> William Taylor wrote:
> > 
> > In article <davis-0901961913020001@pppsb24.itg.ti.com> Tom L. Davis,
> > davis@adrs1.dseg.ti.com writes:
> > > Nobody argues that the PPC is faster in floating point. However for most
> > >    users, 99% of the time is spent in integer functions. Integer benchmarks
> > >    show that there is very little diffeence between the 2 processors (and
> > >    at least the x86 camp has a Pentium Pro to upgrade to today).
> > Can you say "realtime 3D"? It is coming quickly, and Intel PC's are
> > going to be way behind the curve. A 604 is 1/6 the price of a P6/200
> > yet offers comparable FPU speed.
> > Pentium's are even farther behind.
> Pshaw. This is meaningless for at least 2 reasons. First, 604 computers
> do not have any price advantage over Pentium Pro computers. Second,
> nobody in their right minds would do 3d without hardware acceleration,
> and the options for that will be fairly equal on both platforms with
> maybe a small price advantage on the PC side.
> 
> It's the accelerators that made SGI such a hot item, not "its" CPUs.
> 

Correct.  I ported an OpenGL application which does real-time molecular
modelling to a PC from the SGI/DEC/HP platforms.  Frankly, no matter
how fast a Pentium Pro you get, the interactive performance of my port
will be lower than that of the SGI because of the hardware acceleration.
It's a shame, too, because a PPro would probably compare to a midrange
SGI favorably except for that.

I hear that Matrox is coming out with a (or already has) graphics card
that has 3d hardware acceleration.  An 8MB Millenium or some such.
When that comes out, I hope to acquire a PPro with that card and
benchmark it against the SGIs I use (Indigo^2s).  

Since this an advocacy group, I might mention-
the program I ported would not work on NT, 95, or MacOS in a million
years.  Fortunately, Linus wrote Linux, MetroLink ported OpenGL, and
I ported a $10,000 molecular modelling package in less than two weeks.



> 
> --
> 
> Damir Smitlener
> damir@mindspring.com


--
-- David Konerding --
dek@cgl.ucsf.edu
http://picasso.ucsf.edu/~dek/
Technical Details
Message-ID: <4daet2$1p4@darkstar.UCSC.EDU>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!arapaho.cse.ucsc.edu!rafael
References: <nelsoni.821198530@rintintin.Colorado.EDU> <4d4omk$otj@steel.interlog.com> <Pine.SOL.3.91.960111201039.20821C-100000@howard> <4d61cs$k9s@ixnews5.ix.netcom.com> <30F70A12.8FFA6F0@mindspring.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!arapaho.cse.ucsc.edu!rafael
From: rafael@arapaho.cse.ucsc.edu (David E. Konerding)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.powerpc,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.sys.amiga.advocacy,comp.sys.intel,alt.2600
Subject: Re: Debate: PowerMac "trounces" Pentium....???
Date: 14 Jan 1996 08:29:22 GMT
Organization: University of California, Santa Cruz
Message-ID: <4daet2$1p4@darkstar.UCSC.EDU>
References: <nelsoni.821198530@rintintin.Colorado.EDU> <4d4omk$otj@steel.interlog.com> <Pine.SOL.3.91.960111201039.20821C-100000@howard> <4d61cs$k9s@ixnews5.ix.netcom.com> <30F70A12.8FFA6F0@mindspring.com>
Reply-To: dek@cgl.ucsf.edu
NNTP-Posting-Host: arapaho.cse.ucsc.edu
X-Newsreader: slrn (0.7.5.0)