Article View: comp.sys.powerpc
Article #2790Re: Debate: PowerMac "trounces" Pentium....???
From: Cyberphuck
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 1996 07:24
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 1996 07:24
13 lines
1123 bytes
1123 bytes
nahender@prairie.NoDak.edu (Nathanael J Henderson) wrote: >[...BeBox...] >: The current box with dual-603s is in every way faster and more >: responsive than the fastest Mac I have played with (an 8500/120.) Linux >: on this baby will _cook_, and the thought of dual 601s or (steady, now) >: 604s is almost too much to handle. Has anyone tried to install NT 3.51 on a BeBox? If so, does it run any faster than a comparable dual Pentium, or single Alpha? Andy alewman@tiac.net
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4dcksv$ijm@sundog.tiac.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sundog.tiac.net!usenetReferences:
<4cf46j$1ev4@hopi.gate.net> <30ED06B8.2D83@mts.se> <4d3qo3$2ja@ping1.ping.be> <30F80CC8.5BAE70FA@mindspring.com> <4dc30m$3ma@daily-planet.nodak.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sundog.tiac.net!usenet From: alewman@tiac.net (Cyberphuck) Newsgroups: comp.sys.powerpc,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.sys.amiga.advocacy,comp.sys.intel,alt.2600 Subject: Re: Debate: PowerMac "trounces" Pentium....??? Date: Mon, 15 Jan 1996 07:24:48 GMT Organization: The Internet Access Company Message-ID: <4dcksv$ijm@sundog.tiac.net> References: <4cf46j$1ev4@hopi.gate.net> <30ED06B8.2D83@mts.se> <4d3qo3$2ja@ping1.ping.be> <30F80CC8.5BAE70FA@mindspring.com> <4dc30m$3ma@daily-planet.nodak.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: alewman.tiac.net X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82