Article View: comp.sys.powerpc
Article #2811Re: Debate: PowerMac "trounces" Pentium....???
From: Dave Glue
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 1996 14:02
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 1996 14:02
18 lines
1316 bytes
1316 bytes
On 15 Jan 1996 11:41:49 -0500, cirby@gate.net (Chad Irby) wrote: > >Not to mention that little company in California that is working on a 700 >(yes, seven *hundred*) MHz version of the PPC. And how close are they? From what I've read, they have a set of "technologies" which they "hope" will enable such a fast PPC. How competitive, price wise, will it be? I hope for it, if it's comparable pricing to say, a 150mhz 604e at the time it could revolutionize the processor landscape. But what is the mhz-relative to- a 601, 603, or a 604? How much faster could they clock it after 700? Since it's a process technology, what are the bets Intel might not come up with something similar? Frankly, I'm not putting anything past them, especially after reading the tidbits about the P7.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4deme9$6db@steel.interlog.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!news.interlog.com!newsReferences:
<4de04d$ekmm@navajo.gate.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!news.interlog.com!news From: daveacg@interlog.com (Dave Glue) Newsgroups: comp.sys.powerpc,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.sys.amiga.advocacy,comp.sys.intel Subject: Re: Debate: PowerMac "trounces" Pentium....??? Date: Tue, 16 Jan 1996 14:02:48 GMT Organization: InterLog Internet Services Message-ID: <4deme9$6db@steel.interlog.com> References: <4de04d$ekmm@navajo.gate.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: daveacg.interlog.com X-Newsreader: Moe's Newsreader