Article View: comp.sys.powerpc
Article #2873Re: Debate: PowerMac "trounces" Pentium....???
From: Joe Sloan
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 1996 00:19
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 1996 00:19
16 lines
1072 bytes
1072 bytes
In article <4djce3$a26@steel.interlog.com>, Dave Glue <daveacg@interlog.com> wrote: >>BTW, "sources" claim that Klamath will still be faster than the fastest >>Pentium. No other performance details were available and Intel declined to >>comment on rumors. > >Faster- on NT only, of course (OS/2 as well). Wrong - definitely faster on Linux, FreeBSD, netBSD, Solaris and SCO - and NOT any faster on win95 (yawn - nt? who knows? who cares? ) -- Joe Sloan jjs@roundup.com
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4dk3n1$oc5@galaxy.ucr.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!taipei.ucr.edu!jjsReferences:
<30F1D5A5.637A@medcor.mcgill.ca> <4d4omk$otj@steel.interlog.com> <jragosta-1201960805050001@ppp-1018.dca.net> <4djce3$a26@steel.interlog.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!taipei.ucr.edu!jjs From: jjs@taipei.ucr.edu (Joe Sloan) Newsgroups: comp.sys.powerpc,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.sys.amiga.advocacy,comp.sys.intel,alt.2600 Subject: Re: Debate: PowerMac "trounces" Pentium....??? Date: 18 Jan 1996 00:19:45 GMT Organization: University of Calfornia at Riverside Message-ID: <4dk3n1$oc5@galaxy.ucr.edu> References: <30F1D5A5.637A@medcor.mcgill.ca> <4d4omk$otj@steel.interlog.com> <jragosta-1201960805050001@ppp-1018.dca.net> <4djce3$a26@steel.interlog.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: taipei.ucr.edu