🚀 go-pugleaf

** On 26-Jan-96 21:39:32 Joe Ragosta
**  <jragosta@dca.net>
** wrote about "Re: Debate: PowerMac "trounces" Pentium....???"
** in "comp.sys.amiga.advocacy"...

> In article <1996Jan26.192156@eigb>, luginbuh@eigb wrote:

>> It's not a real multitask. It's a cooperatly multitask. In this mode you
>> have a Windows 3.x platform running well with 4M, if you don't use last
>> Micro$oft memory eater products. Any way, new products will need more
>> memory to run, due to new features AND because it semms that as people get
>> more and more  memories on their computers programmers don't bother on code
>> size.

> [ snip ]
> If you'd like to argue that preemptive multitasking is superior in some
> way and have facts to support it, feel free. But your statement that MacOS
> or Win3.1 don't multitask is just plain wrong.

 Explain to *ignornant* *me* _HOW_ to make Win3.1 *multitask*. :-/

 Any attempts that I have made in that way has been *effecitvely* stopped by
 Windoze. >:-{


/Hannu E. K. Nevalainen, Amiga user since '85.
--
>  Have a look at these URL's to inform yourself...
>> http://www.amiga.de/                (*.de*  is slow from Sweden)
>> http://www.mot.com/SPS/PowerPC/library/press_releases/amiga.html
<tsb> A "Tag" follows... Name: /Acronyms/ 

Acronyms:
1) Macintosh = Machine Always Crashes. If Not - The OS Hangs.
2) Windows   = Will Install Needless Data On Whole System.
3) Warp      = What Amiga Really Practise
3) Linux     = Long and Intense Nudge causes User eXceptions
4) Amiga     = Amazing Multimedia Interaction Gets Available

1-3; Stolen from: Johnny Bonde <jbngood@silkeborg.bib.dk>
4&5; a95hanne@ida.his.se  (Do you have moore?)

<tsb> I began writing this message 27-Jan-96 16:56:42, local time.