Article View: comp.sys.powerpc
Article #3091Re: Debate: PowerMac "trounces" Pentium....???
From: Robert Salasidis
Date: Sat, 10 Feb 1996 19:22
Date: Sat, 10 Feb 1996 19:22
24 lines
2139 bytes
2139 bytes
Dave Glue wrote: > > On 7 Feb 1996 23:12:10 GMT, jerry@cybercom.net (Jerry Shekhel) wrote: > > >Robert Salasidis (salasidis@medcor.mcgill.ca) wrote: > >: > >: That is why there are OSes such as UNIX and NT. They not only preemtively > >: multitask, but also support task priorities. If a task executing can not be > >: interrupted, then it is executed at a higher priority level than other > >: processes. W95 does not support priority levels, and as such would make a > >: poor choice as a platform for real-time applications. > >: > > > >Wrong. Win95 supports priority levels. It says so right in my VC++ Online > >Books. Where are you getting your info? > > Further proof is provided by two game demo's I recently played- > Pitfall and EW Jim for 95. Both have 3 levels of "attention" to give > to the program- Normal, Real Time, and Exclusive. So then how do I launch excel or another application in a lower priority mode, while leaving my word processor in the highest priority mode (so that my real time responce is unaffected by a computationally intensive app). I have been unable to do this to date.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<311CF068.9F1@medcor.mcgill.ca>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!news.mcgill.ca!newsReferences:
<4csn1n$klb@macshack.com> <DKxzFK.2r6@eskimo.com> <4d3m6o$bb6@macshack.com> <4d428mINNe14@anaconda.cis.ohio-state.edu> <4d9ui4$e63@macshack.com> <david-1401960302090001@s245_7.resnet.ucla.edu> <1996Jan26.192156@eigb> <jragosta-2601961539320001@ppp-1001.dca.net> <slrn4gjgv2.1v5.oakley@conti.oz.net> <310DACAE.3627@38north.com> <31151B6E.10FE@medcor.mcgill.ca> <4fbbkb$2h3@orion.cybercom.net> <4fda18$o34@steel.interlog.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!news.mcgill.ca!news From: Robert Salasidis <salasidis@medcor.mcgill.ca> Newsgroups: comp.sys.powerpc,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.sys.amiga.advocacy,comp.sys.intel Subject: Re: Debate: PowerMac "trounces" Pentium....??? Date: Sat, 10 Feb 1996 14:22:16 -0500 Organization: Salasoft Inc. Message-ID: <311CF068.9F1@medcor.mcgill.ca> References: <4csn1n$klb@macshack.com> <DKxzFK.2r6@eskimo.com> <4d3m6o$bb6@macshack.com> <4d428mINNe14@anaconda.cis.ohio-state.edu> <4d9ui4$e63@macshack.com> <david-1401960302090001@s245_7.resnet.ucla.edu> <1996Jan26.192156@eigb> <jragosta-2601961539320001@ppp-1001.dca.net> <slrn4gjgv2.1v5.oakley@conti.oz.net> <310DACAE.3627@38north.com> <31151B6E.10FE@medcor.mcgill.ca> <4fbbkb$2h3@orion.cybercom.net> <4fda18$o34@steel.interlog.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: u-10.das.mcgill.ca Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0b4 (Win95; I)