Article View: comp.sys.powerpc
Article #3152Re: Debate: PowerMac "trounces" Pentium....???
From: David T. Wang
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 1996 14:04
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 1996 14:04
15 lines
1290 bytes
1290 bytes
Mel Martinez (mem@jhu.edu) wrote: : Whoever is saying this is quite wrong. Copland will provide full : preemptive multitasking and protected memory for processes. Old legacy : apps will run cooperatively within one larger process, but that process : will be isolated from all other Copland processes. Why does this sound Win95-ish? : Cheers, : Dr. Mel Martinez : The Johns Hopkins University : Dept. of Physics : mem@jhu.edu
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4gckcj$de3@cville-srv.wam.umd.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!vdal2.eng.umd.edu!veakbladReferences:
<nevin-0602962253080001@150.135.1.79> <danpop.824304112@rscernix> <4g00uj$gaq@nuke.csu.net> <danpop.824477998@rscernix> <4g3t0l$b71@nuke.csu.net> <danpop.824606547@rscernix> <mem-1902961857250001@durin.pha.jhu.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!vdal2.eng.umd.edu!veakblad From: veakblad@Glue.umd.edu (David T. Wang) Newsgroups: comp.sys.powerpc,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.sys.amiga.advocacy,comp.sys.intel Subject: Re: Debate: PowerMac "trounces" Pentium....??? Followup-To: comp.sys.powerpc,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.sys.amiga.advocacy,comp.sys.intel Date: 20 Feb 1996 14:04:03 GMT Organization: University of Maryland College Park Message-ID: <4gckcj$de3@cville-srv.wam.umd.edu> References: <nevin-0602962253080001@150.135.1.79> <danpop.824304112@rscernix> <4g00uj$gaq@nuke.csu.net> <danpop.824477998@rscernix> <4g3t0l$b71@nuke.csu.net> <danpop.824606547@rscernix> <mem-1902961857250001@durin.pha.jhu.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: vdal2.eng.umd.edu X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]