Article View: comp.sys.powerpc
Article #3331Re: Debate: PowerMac "trounces" Pentium....???
From: Dan Pop
Date: Fri, 08 Mar 1996 21:46
Date: Fri, 08 Mar 1996 21:46
46 lines
2708 bytes
2708 bytes
In <cirby-0703961245320001@pm3-19.magicnet.net> cirby@magicnet.net (Chad Irby) writes: >danpop@mail.cern.ch (Dan Pop) wrote: > >>cirby@magicnet.net (Chad Irby) writes: > >>>Hmmm. One of my clients called me a few months back, asking me for some >>>help. He has a Mac server that's been in operation for a couple of years, >>>and he wanted to know if it was okay to shut it down to change out the UPS >>>(which was a few years old- he wanted to swap batteries). >> >>Do you have any clue about what "workgroup server" means? >>Hint: it's something a MacOS box can't even dream of. > >Hint: You have no idea of what a Mac can or can't do. > >You wanted a "comparable up time on a non-idle Mac box," and I gave it to >you. If you want Workgroup Server times, the best I know of is about six >months (yes, I know what a WS is, and *yes*, Macs have been doing it for >years). Nope, you obviously don't. How many dozens of interactive users, connected from ASCII and X terminals does a Mac "workgroup server" support? The MacOS interactive multiuser support is known as one of its main selling points, right? >Here's another one: I have another client that bought a small server (a >6150 series) last year. They've taken it down twice, both times to move >to different offices. Bigger offices- they're expanding like crazy. >Other than that, it's run smooth and uninterrupted for the last six >months. It does everything from print sharing to file sharing to program >serving. It's the main repository for the whole office, and they have had >*zero* problems. How many interactive users are running their number crunching applications on that server? If you want a stable file and print server, MSDOS + Lantastic is good enough for the job. Been there, done that. Dan -- Dan Pop CERN, CN Division Email: danpop@mail.cern.ch Mail: CERN - PPE, Bat. 31 R-004, CH-1211 Geneve 23, Switzerland
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<danpop.826321567@rscernix>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!rcp6.elan.af.mil!rscernix!danpopReferences:
<mazulauf-2202962208530001@grumpy.met.utah.edu> <AD580C79-6B2AC@153.37.136.28> <mazulauf-0303961034400001@grumpy.met.utah.edu> <danpop.825958803@rscernix> <cirby-0603960035300001@pm5-22.magicnet.net> <danpop.826152657@rscernix> <cirby-0703961245320001@pm3-19.magicnet.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!rcp6.elan.af.mil!rscernix!danpop From: danpop@mail.cern.ch (Dan Pop) Newsgroups: comp.sys.powerpc,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.sys.amiga.advocacy,comp.sys.intel Subject: Re: Debate: PowerMac "trounces" Pentium....??? Date: 8 Mar 96 21:46:07 GMT Organization: CERN European Lab for Particle Physics Message-ID: <danpop.826321567@rscernix> References: <mazulauf-2202962208530001@grumpy.met.utah.edu> <AD580C79-6B2AC@153.37.136.28> <mazulauf-0303961034400001@grumpy.met.utah.edu> <danpop.825958803@rscernix> <cirby-0603960035300001@pm5-22.magicnet.net> <danpop.826152657@rscernix> <cirby-0703961245320001@pm3-19.magicnet.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: ues5.cern.ch X-Newsreader: NN version 6.5.0 #7 (NOV)