Article View: comp.sys.powerpc
Article #3366Re: Copland merely shifts the burden to the programmer
From: William Taylor
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 1996 18:27
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 1996 18:27
40 lines
3065 bytes
3065 bytes
In article <4i96nq$o48@ra.nrl.navy.mil> Richard Pitre, pitre@n5160d.nrl.navy.mil writes: >It depends what you are comparing. >If you are comparing verifiably functional chips in production then I would >say that the correct thing to do is replace the word trounce with "pounds the >shit out of". If you compare them at the same clock speed then its just a silly >irresponsible joke to attempt a comparison. Depends on a lot of things. From personal experience my old 8100/80 running 7.5.3 is as fast or faster than my old XPS90 pentium box (faster since the arrival of Win95 and Office95). The 9500/120's at work simply smoke our P5/133's at anything other than running Microsoft code. The 604 based boxes are easily as fast as the P6/150's. Hopefully I can get some P5/200's later this year to see how they do. A lot of factors decide the speed of a system (the speed the average user sees when running day to day tasks). For PMac's running System 7.5.3 with a fast harddrive, basically any drive other than an Apple drive, makes a huge difference. For Win95 users, 16-32MB of RAM and a good video card can make a P90 feel faster than a P5/150. With Apple's products, I have been very impressed with the fact that the systems get faster with every OS revision, that the hardware truly 100% PnP, that the MacOS can do what it does despite the age of the foundation it rests on. Basically what I want out of PC hardware is what the Mac has had since the Mac II. My PC is a perfect example. It is a less-than-current P90 with PCI and a PnP BIOS. yet, I can add no more cards! I am flat out of IRQ's, and no amount of shuffling can make any more. I don't even know if Mac's even HAVE IRQ's<g>. In addition, the PC has required several system BIOS, video card BIOS and SCSI card BIOS updates just the keep everything working together. Give me the functional equivilent of Mac hardware with the ability to run NT, UNIX, and Win95 or the MacOS and I'll be totally happy. Right now the PC can run the OS's I want but the hardware is archaic. The Mac has the hardware I want but currently lacks access to the other OS's. PPCP could change all of that though. WT
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4iccpu$266@cloner3.netcom.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!ix-mem-tn1-08.ix.netcom.com!wwtaylorReferences:
<4hltk5$qn9@news-f.iadfw.net> <31488E66.77FE@mts.se> <4ic4oi$a82@nntpb.cb.att.com> <4ic6i6$mnk@info.estec.esa.nl>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!ix-mem-tn1-08.ix.netcom.com!wwtaylor From: William Taylor <wwtaylor@ix.netcom.com> Newsgroups: comp.sys.powerpc,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.sys.amiga.advocacy Subject: Re: Copland merely shifts the burden to the programmer Date: 15 Mar 1996 18:27:10 GMT Organization: CMC, Inc Distribution: world Message-ID: <4iccpu$266@cloner3.netcom.com> References: <4hltk5$qn9@news-f.iadfw.net> <31488E66.77FE@mts.se> <4ic4oi$a82@nntpb.cb.att.com> <4ic6i6$mnk@info.estec.esa.nl> NNTP-Posting-Host: ix-mem-tn1-08.ix.netcom.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-NETCOM-Date: Fri Mar 15 10:27:10 AM PST 1996 X-Newsreader: Nuntius 2.0.4_68K X-XXMessage-ID: <AD6F132A2B028D28@ix-mem-tn1-08.ix.netcom.com> X-XXDate: Fri, 15 Mar 1996 17:29:30 GMT