Article View: comp.sys.powerpc
Article #341Re: Debate: PowerMac "trounces" Pentium....???
From: Dan Pop
Date: Wed, 02 Aug 1995 17:04
Date: Wed, 02 Aug 1995 17:04
29 lines
1717 bytes
1717 bytes
In <DCnxx1.MMw@nntpa.cb.att.com> gupta@mrspock.mt.att.com (Arun Gupta) writes: >In article Dan Pop <Dan.Pop@mail.cern.ch> cited this machine >> >>SNI/Pyr PC/E5S Pentium 30/90 256+8/8 86.3 72.7 Jul94 c.bmarks > >and wrote that it takes a 604 to show a marginal edge over the Pentium. > >Here is the set of numbers for 601s that I found, Enjoy ! >[Here's how the argument has gone so far : > 1. Dan Pop claims that Pentium 66 beats 601/66, pulls a couple > of examples from the specmark table to "prove" that. Please don't put words in my mouth. I have never claimed that a P66 beats a 601/66. Have the minimal decency to quote my statements correctly. > > 2. Since there are more specmarks than his examples, he then pulls > out the Pentium 90, and digresses on price. He also claims that > only a 604 beats that. Right. Show me a 601 which will beat a 133 MHz Pentium. I claimed that only a 604 will beat it. I'd love to be proven wrong. Dan -- Dan Pop CERN, CN Division Email: Dan.Pop@mail.cern.ch Mail: CERN - PPE, Bat. 31 R-004, CH-1211 Geneve 23, Switzerland
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<danpop.807383097@rscernix>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!CERN.ch!rscernix!danpopReferences:
<DCnxx1.MMw@nntpa.cb.att.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.powerpc,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.sys.amiga.advocacy,comp.sys.intel,alt.2600,alt.destroy.microsoft Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!CERN.ch!rscernix!danpop From: Dan.Pop@mail.cern.ch (Dan Pop) Subject: Re: Debate: PowerMac "trounces" Pentium....??? X-Nntp-Posting-Host: ues5.cern.ch Message-ID: <danpop.807383097@rscernix> Sender: news@news.cern.ch (USENET News System) Organization: CERN European Lab for Particle Physics X-Newsreader: NN version 6.5.0 #9 (NOV) References: <DCnxx1.MMw@nntpa.cb.att.com> Date: Wed, 2 Aug 1995 17:04:57 GMT