Article View: comp.sys.powerpc
Article #3527Re: Debate: PowerMac "trounces" Pentium....???
From: David K. Every
Date: Sat, 30 Mar 1996 14:30
Date: Sat, 30 Mar 1996 14:30
64 lines
2727 bytes
2727 bytes
In article <4jj4mj$jnk@nntpb.cb.att.com>, gupta@mrspock.mt.att.com (Arun Gupta) wrote: > Byte benchmarks are CPU intensive. The PowerMac systems do not exhibit > the full strength of the PPC because of non-native OS, etc. -- factors > which enter into the Byte benchmarks only in the math library, ( and > perhaps in cache management ? ) True. > Machine : PPC 7100/66, 512K L2, 40 MB memory > System : System 7.5.3 > Compiler: CodeWarrior 7 > Compiler Settings : Optimize for 601, speed. > Source code : available from www.byte.com > > Quote : > > BYTEmark (tm) Native Mode Benchmark ver. 2 (3/95) > ========== ALL STATISTICS ========== > **Thu Mar 21 22:25:03 1996 > **Macintosh 7.5 > **CodeWarrior > **ver 7 > **Sizeof: int:4 short:2 long:4 > ==================================== [snip] > ===========OVERALL============ > INTEGER INDEX: 0.935630 > FLOATING-POINT INDEX: 0.726772 > (90 MHz Dell Pentium = 1.00) > ============================== Not only is the 66mhz 601 NEARLY as fast as a P90 on your machine - but to be fair, I did the same test on a 6100/66 (same performer) - but used motorolla's compiler, the results follow - > BYTEmark (tm) Native Mode Benchmark ver. 2 (10/95) > ========== ALL STATISTICS ========== > **Thu Mar 26 12:54:43 1996 > **Generic PowerPC > **Motorolla C SDK > **DR 2.0/MPW > **Sizeof: int:4 short:2 long:4 > ==================================== [snip] > ===========OVERALL============ > INTEGER INDEX: 1.23877 > FLOATING-POINT INDEX: 1.238541 > (90 MHz Dell Pentium = 1.00) > ============================== So a 601 was 23% FASTER than a 90mhz pentium. Not bad. But as mentioned this is processor intensive, and to be fair, the MacOS is not fully native (like WinNT has WoW, or Win95 has 16 bit code). All hamper performance. So rather than the Mac being 79% faster in the real world, it is more like 40% according to Apple and Dataquest?!?! (Forget who worked on their study). -- David K. Every | MaciDo Warrior - The Macintosh Way Sr. Software Engineer | Jostens Learning Corp. |
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<dke-3003960640050001@adnline36.adnc.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!adnline36.adnc.com!userReferences:
<4jehm6$pfg@meaddata.lexis-nexis.com> <dke-2803961851210001@adnline290.adnc.com> <stephenkDp0JpA.F6u@netcom.com> <aqtjo-2903960750290001@129.219.116.52> <4jj4mj$jnk@nntpb.cb.att.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!adnline36.adnc.com!user From: dke@adnc.com (David K. Every) Newsgroups: comp.sys.powerpc,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.sys.amiga.advocacy,comp.sys.intel Subject: Re: Debate: PowerMac "trounces" Pentium....??? Date: 30 Mar 1996 14:30:49 GMT Organization: Jostens Learning Message-ID: <dke-3003960640050001@adnline36.adnc.com> References: <4jehm6$pfg@meaddata.lexis-nexis.com> <dke-2803961851210001@adnline290.adnc.com> <stephenkDp0JpA.F6u@netcom.com> <aqtjo-2903960750290001@129.219.116.52> <4jj4mj$jnk@nntpb.cb.att.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.216.154.37