🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <danpop.807312743@rscernix>, Dan Pop <Dan.Pop@mail.cern.ch> wrote:
 >In <ericb.482.301E43AD@psu.edu> ericb@psu.edu (Eric Bennett) writes:
 >
 >>In article <3vjsar$o3l@galaxy.ucr.edu> jjs@dostoevsky.ucr.edu (Joe Sloan) writes:
 >>
 >>>Oh, and I can run mac apps under linux/X11R6 with executor - 
 >>
 >>Yeah, and I can play Heretic under SoftWindows... NOT.  Executor is neat, but 
 >>not very useful since it fails on quite a few Mac applications.
 >>
 >Who cares, as long as it runs _those_ applications you want/need to run?
 >
 >The nicest feature of the Executor is that it is a good citizen in a
 >multi-tasking environment.  I use it remotely, from my Alpha workstation,
 >and the owner of the Linux box isn't affected by the fact that I'm using
 >his box to emulate a Mac, while he's doing his work on the box.  Remote
 >Mac control without Timbuktu :-)

I have used the thing too! It's very nice, and fast! It's faster over
a networked X terminal than a real Mac using the local video bus.
Plus it doesn't crash your computer when something goes wrong. I'd say
that the Executor "outmacs" the Mac.