Re: UseMarks -- our own benchmarks

Article View: comp.sys.powerpc

Article #3532

#3532

From: Maynard Handley
Date: Sat, 30 Mar 1996 21:11

12 lines
870 bytes

> Actually, it is a VERY good benchmark for FLOATING POINT!  Most people
have said
> THAT is where the PPC shines.  Given that, you did well.
> 

It is a benchmark for transcendental libraries. This is very different
from a benchmark for floating point. 

Maynard

-- 
My opinion only

Technical Details

Message-ID: <handleym-3003961311030001@a17-202-32-93.apple.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!a17-202-32-93.apple.com!user

References: <4jhbus$dga@nuke.csu.net> <4jfs0h$mer@daily-planet.nodak.edu> <4jh7qt$e1s@nuke.csu.net> <stephenkDp1srL.2B4@netcom.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!a17-202-32-93.apple.com!user
From: handleym@apple.com (Maynard Handley)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.powerpc,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.sys.amiga.advocacy,comp.sys.intel
Subject: Re: UseMarks -- our own benchmarks
Date: Sat, 30 Mar 1996 13:11:03 -0800
Organization: Apple Computer
Message-ID: <handleym-3003961311030001@a17-202-32-93.apple.com>
References: <4jhbus$dga@nuke.csu.net> <4jfs0h$mer@daily-planet.nodak.edu> <4jh7qt$e1s@nuke.csu.net> <stephenkDp1srL.2B4@netcom.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: a17-202-32-93.apple.com

Reply to Parent Message