🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.sys.powerpc
Article #3589

Re: Pentium/PowerMac parity. Was Re: Debate: PowerMac "trounces" Pentium....???

#3589
From: Troy Beukema
Date: Tue, 09 Apr 1996 12:40
49 lines
2709 bytes
In article <31699471.5C0@noran.com>, Dave Greunke  <vid@noran.com> wrote:

>So, lets see what you're saying here.... A 100 MHz+ Pentium is faster
>than a 66 Mhz Sparc.... Wow what an incredible revelation.
[rest of hate-flame snipped]

I am sorry if I offended you with my observations.  I completely
disagreed with a comment that someone posted, so I offered my
perspective, based on real life experience with many different
workstations.

Here is some extra information a nice person sent me if you need more info
to be convinced that the P5-P6 PCs are workstation class machines :

[sender's name snipped intentionally]
>to provide some real world program experiences (under linux):
>
>IBM RS/6000-590         44 secs         95 secs
>DEC 21064A-275          33 secs         --
>P6-200                  20 secs         50 secs
>
>heavy floating point (crystallographic least squares of protein structures,
>the kind of stuff pharmaceutical companies do in drug development - I work
>for a chemical company in that sector).
>
>The P6-200 has a modest 64 MB memory and 5.5 GB disk (we have a total of
>around 20 GB on all our P5/P6 systems, and none except for an old P5-60,
>has less than 32 MB memory - all of course run exclusively linux)

Assuming the P5 is around 1/2 as fast as the P6 machine, we see the PC
is a workstation class machine, and linux is getting very close to
a professional workstation-quality OS; not to mention the fact that
many commercial unices are also available.  I believe the P6 is commonly
regarded as a workstation killer, and MMX will only strengthen its position.

Your snide observation about clock frequency is incorrect.  Tell me if a
100Mhz 486 will outrun the Sparc 20-66 or a 100MHz P5.

Have a nice day.

-Troy

>
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Dave Greunke                | Internet:   vid@noran.com
>Systems Administrator       | aka: webmaster@noran.com
>Noran Instruments, Inc.     |
>Middleton, WI.              |
>(608)836-4125               |
Technical Details
Message-ID: <4kdlsj$132j@watnews1.watson.ibm.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!watson.ibm.com!tjb
References: <toms4-1603961411330001@ppp-15.ts-3.la.idt.net> <3165721A.2A6D@gaia.arc.nasa.gov> <4k6545$i2c@watnews1.watson.ibm.com> <31699471.5C0@noran.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!watson.ibm.com!tjb
From: tjb@watson.ibm.com (Troy Beukema)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.powerpc,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.sys.amiga.advocacy,comp.sys.intel
Subject: Re: Pentium/PowerMac parity. Was Re: Debate: PowerMac "trounces" Pentium....???
Date: 9 Apr 1996 12:40:51 GMT
Organization: IBM TJ Watson Research Center
Message-ID: <4kdlsj$132j@watnews1.watson.ibm.com>
References: <toms4-1603961411330001@ppp-15.ts-3.la.idt.net> <3165721A.2A6D@gaia.arc.nasa.gov> <4k6545$i2c@watnews1.watson.ibm.com> <31699471.5C0@noran.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: tnewton.watson.ibm.com