Article View: comp.sys.powerpc
Article #3589Re: Pentium/PowerMac parity. Was Re: Debate: PowerMac "trounces" Pentium....???
From: Troy Beukema
Date: Tue, 09 Apr 1996 12:40
Date: Tue, 09 Apr 1996 12:40
49 lines
2709 bytes
2709 bytes
In article <31699471.5C0@noran.com>, Dave Greunke <vid@noran.com> wrote: >So, lets see what you're saying here.... A 100 MHz+ Pentium is faster >than a 66 Mhz Sparc.... Wow what an incredible revelation. [rest of hate-flame snipped] I am sorry if I offended you with my observations. I completely disagreed with a comment that someone posted, so I offered my perspective, based on real life experience with many different workstations. Here is some extra information a nice person sent me if you need more info to be convinced that the P5-P6 PCs are workstation class machines : [sender's name snipped intentionally] >to provide some real world program experiences (under linux): > >IBM RS/6000-590 44 secs 95 secs >DEC 21064A-275 33 secs -- >P6-200 20 secs 50 secs > >heavy floating point (crystallographic least squares of protein structures, >the kind of stuff pharmaceutical companies do in drug development - I work >for a chemical company in that sector). > >The P6-200 has a modest 64 MB memory and 5.5 GB disk (we have a total of >around 20 GB on all our P5/P6 systems, and none except for an old P5-60, >has less than 32 MB memory - all of course run exclusively linux) Assuming the P5 is around 1/2 as fast as the P6 machine, we see the PC is a workstation class machine, and linux is getting very close to a professional workstation-quality OS; not to mention the fact that many commercial unices are also available. I believe the P6 is commonly regarded as a workstation killer, and MMX will only strengthen its position. Your snide observation about clock frequency is incorrect. Tell me if a 100Mhz 486 will outrun the Sparc 20-66 or a 100MHz P5. Have a nice day. -Troy > >-------------------------------------------------------------------------- >Dave Greunke | Internet: vid@noran.com >Systems Administrator | aka: webmaster@noran.com >Noran Instruments, Inc. | >Middleton, WI. | >(608)836-4125 |
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4kdlsj$132j@watnews1.watson.ibm.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!watson.ibm.com!tjbReferences:
<toms4-1603961411330001@ppp-15.ts-3.la.idt.net> <3165721A.2A6D@gaia.arc.nasa.gov> <4k6545$i2c@watnews1.watson.ibm.com> <31699471.5C0@noran.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!watson.ibm.com!tjb From: tjb@watson.ibm.com (Troy Beukema) Newsgroups: comp.sys.powerpc,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.sys.amiga.advocacy,comp.sys.intel Subject: Re: Pentium/PowerMac parity. Was Re: Debate: PowerMac "trounces" Pentium....??? Date: 9 Apr 1996 12:40:51 GMT Organization: IBM TJ Watson Research Center Message-ID: <4kdlsj$132j@watnews1.watson.ibm.com> References: <toms4-1603961411330001@ppp-15.ts-3.la.idt.net> <3165721A.2A6D@gaia.arc.nasa.gov> <4k6545$i2c@watnews1.watson.ibm.com> <31699471.5C0@noran.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: tnewton.watson.ibm.com