Re: Pentium/PowerMac parity. Was Re: Debate: PowerMac "trounces" Pentium....???

Article View: comp.sys.powerpc

Article #3594

#3594

From: Phil Ronzone
Date: Tue, 09 Apr 1996 20:35

14 lines
1048 bytes

In article <316AB963.14DA@noran.com> Dave Greunke <vid@noran.com> writes:
    >... Which of course is total crap. If you want to make a
    >valid comparison try comparing a 100 Mhz Sparc 20 to a 100
    >Mhz Pentium.

No, that's crap.

Compare say, a $500 Solaris chip to a $500 Intel chip.

Make the comparision economic.
-- 
"I didn't do it, nobody saw me, and you can't prove it!" - B. Simpson

These opinions are MINE, and you can't have 'em! (But I'll rent 'em cheap ...)

Technical Details

Message-ID: <philDpM3uv.7ML@netcom.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!netcom.com!phil

References: <31699471.5C0@noran.com> <4kdlsj$132j@watnews1.watson.ibm.com> <316AB963.14DA@noran.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: comp.sys.powerpc,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.sys.amiga.advocacy,comp.sys.intel
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!netcom.com!phil
From: phil@netcom.com (Phil Ronzone)
Subject: Re: Pentium/PowerMac parity. Was Re: Debate: PowerMac "trounces" Pentium....???
Message-ID: <philDpM3uv.7ML@netcom.com>
Organization: Generally in favor of, but mostly random.
References: <31699471.5C0@noran.com> <4kdlsj$132j@watnews1.watson.ibm.com> <316AB963.14DA@noran.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 1996 20:35:18 GMT
Sender: phil@netcom.netcom.com

Reply to Parent Message