🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.sys.powerpc
Article #3599

Re: Debate: PowerMac "trounces" Pentium....???

#3599
From: William Taylor
Date: Tue, 09 Apr 1996 15:33
26 lines
2179 bytes
In article <4k6545$i2c@watnews1.watson.ibm.com> Troy Beukema,
tjb@watson.ibm.com writes:
>I disagree with the both of you.  I know, from experience, that
>a P5-100+ under Linux will outrun a Sparc-20 66/SunOS, and keep up with
>RS-6000/AIX boxes fairly well.  I have read the P6-200 is in the class
>of the Ultra Sparc.  You can plunk 128Mbytes of memory in the
>things.  You can have 10Gbytes of disk storage if you want.  Most
>of the key components, such as HD & memory, are the same as those
>used in high end workstations.  All I see in a high end workstation
>is better packaging, for a LOT more money.  Buy 3 PCs for the cost
>of one workstation, and just throw the PC away when it breaks, you'd
>still be ahead.
>

My experience has been that Sun's are generally slow. RS/6000's are very
fast. We had 66Mhz 601 250's with no L2 cache that outperformed P5/100's
(prior to EDO RAM and SB Cache). The 80Mhz 601 and 604 boxes generally
outperform our p5/120 Gateway's. There is no contest with the Power2
machines.

Also, I simply _like_ the RS/6000's. For our mission critical uses, PC's
just were not stable enough and lacked the vendor support of the high-end
boxes. When the 6000's rarely broke down, they were fixed within less
than 24hrs. In a 24x7 shop that was VERY important.

WT
Technical Details
Message-ID: <4ke00h$7es@dfw-ixnews4.ix.netcom.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!ix-mem-tn1-02.ix.netcom.com!wwtaylor
References: <4jj4mj$jnk@nntpb.cb.att.com> <danpop.828822597@rscernix> <3167FCAA.101@mts.se> <31680215.403E@mts.se>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!ix-mem-tn1-02.ix.netcom.com!wwtaylor
From: William Taylor <wwtaylor@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups: comp.sys.powerpc,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.sys.amiga.advocacy,comp.sys.intel
Subject: Re: Debate: PowerMac "trounces" Pentium....???
Date: 9 Apr 1996 15:33:37 GMT
Organization: CMC, Inc
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <4ke00h$7es@dfw-ixnews4.ix.netcom.com>
References: <4jj4mj$jnk@nntpb.cb.att.com> <danpop.828822597@rscernix> <3167FCAA.101@mts.se> <31680215.403E@mts.se>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ix-mem-tn1-02.ix.netcom.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-NETCOM-Date: Tue Apr 09 10:33:37 AM CDT 1996
X-Newsreader: Nuntius 2.0.4_68K
X-XXMessage-ID: <AD8FEC3D3B038D22@ix-mem-tn1-02.ix.netcom.com>
X-XXDate: Tue, 9 Apr 1996 15:28:13 GMT