Re: Apple?

Article View: comp.sys.powerpc

Article #421

#421

From: Arun Gupta
Date: Thu, 03 Aug 1995 14:45

27 lines
1615 bytes

In article <3vog0e$652@galaxy.ucr.edu>,
Joe Sloan <jjs@dostoevsky.ucr.edu> wrote:
>In article <rmcassid-0108951704580001@dante.eng.uci.edu>,
>Robert Cassidy <rmcassid@uci.edu> wrote:
>>In article <3vlnnh$c47@dockmaster.phantom.com>, wozz@wookie.net (I'm Wozz)
>>wrote:
>>
>>> Arun Gupta (gupta@mrspock.mt.att.com) wrote:
>>> 
>>> : So it takes two people to run a UNIX box ?  No wonder you need all that
>>> : pre-emptive multi-tasking !
>>> 
>>> no, it takes one person to run a Unix box....the others are users...
>>
>>OK, so it takes two people to *use* a UNIX box. Better?
>
>hmm... this is getting tedious...

Because the smileys from the original post were removed.

Seriously, though, the user and system administrator of a Mac is
likely to be one and the same person.  Some of the supposed 
superiority of UNIX systems can be realized only by having an expert, 
who is different from the user, to make sure that the system is set up
correctly.

-arun gupta

Technical Details

Message-ID: <DCqp04.CHv@nntpa.cb.att.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gw2.att.com!nntpa!not-for-mail

References:

<3rps76$e63@osiris.wu-wien.ac.at> <3vlnnh$c47@dockmaster.phantom.com> <rmcassid-0108951704580001@dante.eng.uci.edu> <3vog0e$652@galaxy.ucr.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: comp.sys.powerpc,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.sys.amiga.advocacy,comp.sys.intel,alt.2600,alt.destroy.microsoft
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gw2.att.com!nntpa!not-for-mail
From: gupta@mrspock.mt.att.com (Arun Gupta)
Subject: Re: Apple?
Message-ID: <DCqp04.CHv@nntpa.cb.att.com>
Sender: news@nntpa.cb.att.com (Netnews Administration)
Nntp-Posting-Host: mrspock.mt.att.com
Organization: AT&T
References: <3rps76$e63@osiris.wu-wien.ac.at> <3vlnnh$c47@dockmaster.phantom.com> <rmcassid-0108951704580001@dante.eng.uci.edu> <3vog0e$652@galaxy.ucr.edu>
Date: Thu, 3 Aug 1995 14:45:40 GMT

Reply to Parent Message