🚀 go-pugleaf

Martin Nisshagen <d4nisse> writes:

>Besides this the Amiga also lacks the possibilty to handle realtime=03like
>prcosses in an efficient way. Both Solaris, NT and VMS has much better
>support for this.

How so?  The scheduler on the Amiga is _very_ efficient at handling 
"realtime like" processes?  How could it be better?

>Have seen both Linux and Win95 crash _several_ times... For real
>stabilty and memory protection You would isntead like ta have a
>like NT (with C2 security build in), VMS or stable unixes like
>AIX for example. Besides having _very_ good memory protection and
>security, all of this OS:es also includes very stable journal based
>filesystems who tracks all transactions in the OS. It's almost
>impossible to corrupt this filesystems!

Oh, I _love_ the telnet daemon for Windows NT.  It's _swell_ to just
get a c: prompt with no protection at all.

>Now THIS is stability!!

Or something like that.  ;^)
-- 
echo '[q]sa[ln0=aln256%Pln256/snlbx]sb3135071790101768542287578439snlbxq' | dc