🚀 go-pugleaf

BlackHoleQ (blackholeq@aol.com) wrote:
: >       Said it before, and I'll say it yet again, I like Windows '95.
: It's
: >a GREAT improvement over Win 3.1(although I think you actually have to
: TRY
: >to make something worse), however, aside from multitasking(which didn't
: >help the amiga from going the way of the dodo), it's still=
: >
: >       Win '95 = MacOS '89

: I don't see how so many people seem to insist that underpowered OS +
: stupid interface = perfect operating environment. Win95 is faster, better
: at multitasking, better at virtual memory, has a better file system,
: better disk caching, has a better inteface and more naitive apps. At 6%
: market share, which is likely to get smaller when newbies begin flocking
: to Win95, mac is much more likely to "go the way of the dodo" than
: Windows.

And Linux is even better than the stupid Win95! Better
at Multitasking, better at vm, much better fs, and much better disk
caching.

And the % of market share does not tell anything on the quality of
the product!

Thomas

--
                   Thomas GSCHWIND, Student at Technische Universität WIEN
--oOo--(^)--oOo--  email: tom@logic.tuwien.ac.at
      (o o)        URL: http://fbma.tuwien.ac.at/~e9225658/
       /|\         DOS is too DOSASTROUS for you? Try UN*X!