Article View: comp.sys.powerpc
Article #732Re: Ask yourself these before you choosing a 32bit OS...
From: Curtis Bass
Date: Tue, 08 Aug 1995 12:31
Date: Tue, 08 Aug 1995 12:31
22 lines
1596 bytes
1596 bytes
daveacg@interlog.com (Dave Glue) wrote:
-- snip --
>The fact is, 95 is an evolutionary, not revolutionary, step up from
>Windows. Because of this, it's incomparable to a brand-new OS written
>from the ground up. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
-- snip --
>That doesn't mean 95 won't have bugs- just that its "bugs" are far
>less severe than 3.1's major architectural flaws.
Perhaps, but by your own implied admission (see underline above),
Win9x shares many of Win3.1's "major architectural flaws."
--
When I want your opinion, I'll give Curtis Bass
it to you . . . Software Systems Specialist II
University of Texas Medical Branch
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<407lf6$kf7@atlantis.utmb.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!atlantis.utmb.edu!newsReferences:
<3vh2hc$9dd@falcon.ccs.uwo.ca> <3vhabl$b8l@steel.interlog.com> <3vlrod$19fj@sat.ipp-garching.mpg.de> <n618mq9V5IUS075yn@oslonett.no> <3vu47o$psu@steel.interlog.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!atlantis.utmb.edu!news From: Curtis Bass <cbass%intmeds1.utmb@mhost.utmb.edu> Newsgroups: comp.sys.powerpc,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.sys.amiga.advocacy,comp.sys.intel,alt.2600,alt.destroy.microsoft,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy Subject: Re: Ask yourself these before you choosing a 32bit OS... Date: 8 Aug 1995 12:31:34 GMT Organization: University of Texas Medical Branch Message-ID: <407lf6$kf7@atlantis.utmb.edu> References: <3vh2hc$9dd@falcon.ccs.uwo.ca> <3vhabl$b8l@steel.interlog.com> <3vlrod$19fj@sat.ipp-garching.mpg.de> <n618mq9V5IUS075yn@oslonett.no> <3vu47o$psu@steel.interlog.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 129.109.209.9 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.1N (Windows; I; 16bit)