Article View: comp.sys.powerpc
Article #837Re: JUST REMEMBER WHY WINDOWS WAS CREATED!!!!!!!!!
From: Chester Karma
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 1995 01:10
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 1995 01:10
14 lines
1504 bytes
1504 bytes
In article <3v07bv$pj4@steel.interlog.com> daveacg@interlog.com (Dave Glue) writes: >Depends on how you define "better". They did make it better- >substantially improved it over Win 3.1, while keeping a high degree of >compatibility. NT is certainly a more robust OS, but does that make >it "better" for the average user when it won't load their favorite >app? See that's exactly my point. From a technical standpoint, Windows95 is piecemeal. If they weren't interested in MS-DOS compatibility (like NT), they could have made it a better-running OS. Critics often complain about how Microsoft didn't make any real improvements with Win95, but critics also, many times, fail to realize that if it weren't for their dedication to MS-DOS users, it WOULD have been better.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<fts.30.000CDFED@cris.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!cris.com!ftsReferences:
<3umdi6$25b@ixnews4.ix.netcom.com> <3undjl$jld@newsbf02.news.aol.com> <3upkh6$l1j@steel.interlog.com> <wombat-2207950218350001@d182.claris.com> <fts.27.01025B5A@cris.com> <3v07bv$pj4@steel.interlog.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!cris.com!fts From: fts@cris.com (Chester Karma) Newsgroups: comp.sys.powerpc,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.sys.amiga.advocacy,comp.sys.intel,alt.2600,alt.destroy.microsoft Subject: Re: JUST REMEMBER WHY WINDOWS WAS CREATED!!!!!!!!! Message-ID: <fts.30.000CDFED@cris.com> Date: 10 Aug 95 01:10:11 GMT References: <3umdi6$25b@ixnews4.ix.netcom.com> <3undjl$jld@newsbf02.news.aol.com> <3upkh6$l1j@steel.interlog.com> <wombat-2207950218350001@d182.claris.com> <fts.27.01025B5A@cris.com> <3v07bv$pj4@steel.interlog.com> Organization: FtS Productions NNTP-Posting-Host: crc6-fddi.cris.com X-Newsreader: Trumpet for Windows [Version 1.0 Rev B final beta #4]