Thread View: comp.sys.powerpc
1 messages
1 total messages
Started by Arun Gupta
Tue, 01 Aug 1995 02:38
Re: Debate: PowerMac "trounces" Pentium....???
Author: Arun Gupta
Date: Tue, 01 Aug 1995 02:38
Date: Tue, 01 Aug 1995 02:38
34 lines
1915 bytes
1915 bytes
Someone wrote, giving Specmarks of some 66MHz processor systems : > >System CPU ClkMHz Cache SPECint SPECfp Info Source >Name Type ext/in Ext+I/D 92 92 Date Obtained >============== ======== ====== ========= ======= ======= ===== ========== >SNI/Pyr PC/E5S Pentium 33/66 256+8/8 67.4 61.5 Sep93 SPEC newsl >Compaq DeskproXL Pentium 33/66 256+8/8 65.1 63.6 Sep93 SPEC newsl >IBM 250 MPC601 66 32 62.6 72.2 Jul94 www.ibm From the current version of the table from which the above are taken (to be found on comp.benchmarks) : IBM 40P MPC601 66 32 63.7 67.8 Mar95 www.ibm IBM 40P MPC601 66 256+32 75.1 77.0 Mar95 www.ibm IBM 25T MPC601 66 32 62.6 78.8 Mar95 www.ibm >I avoided the Intel Xpress numbers and stuck to Siemens Nixdorf and Compaq, >for obvious reasons. Just for comparison's sake, here they are : Intel Xpress Pentium 66 256+8/8 78.0 63.6 Mar95 www.intel What is the story with Intel Xpress ? > >The SPEC apps don't seem to run faster on the 601/66 than on the P5/66. >Oh, sorry, I forgot that SPEC data are pure bullshit (because they show the >Pentiums faster than "everbody" knows they actually are :-) Isn't advocacy fun ? -arun gupta
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads