🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Thread View: comp.sys.powerpc
1 messages
1 total messages Started by Arun Gupta Tue, 01 Aug 1995 02:38
Re: Debate: PowerMac "trounces" Pentium....???
#143
Author: Arun Gupta
Date: Tue, 01 Aug 1995 02:38
34 lines
1915 bytes
Someone wrote, giving Specmarks of some 66MHz processor systems :
>
>System           CPU      ClkMHz Cache     SPECint SPECfp  Info  Source
>Name             Type     ext/in Ext+I/D   92      92      Date  Obtained
>==============   ======== ====== ========= ======= ======= ===== ==========
>SNI/Pyr PC/E5S   Pentium  33/66  256+8/8   67.4    61.5    Sep93 SPEC newsl
>Compaq DeskproXL Pentium  33/66  256+8/8   65.1    63.6    Sep93 SPEC newsl
>IBM 250          MPC601   66     32        62.6    72.2    Jul94 www.ibm

From the current version of the table from which the above are taken
(to be found on comp.benchmarks) :

 IBM 40P          MPC601   66     32        63.7    67.8    Mar95 www.ibm
 IBM 40P          MPC601   66     256+32    75.1    77.0    Mar95 www.ibm
 IBM 25T          MPC601   66     32        62.6    78.8    Mar95 www.ibm


>I avoided the Intel Xpress numbers and stuck to Siemens Nixdorf and Compaq,
>for obvious reasons.

Just for comparison's sake, here they are :

 Intel Xpress     Pentium  66     256+8/8   78.0    63.6    Mar95 www.intel

What is the story with Intel Xpress ?
>
>The SPEC apps don't seem to run faster on the 601/66 than on the P5/66.
>Oh, sorry, I forgot that SPEC data are pure bullshit (because they show the
>Pentiums faster than "everbody" knows they actually are :-)

Isn't advocacy fun ?

-arun gupta
Thread Navigation

This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.

Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.

Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.

Back to All Threads