🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Thread View: comp.sys.powerpc
1 messages
1 total messages Started by Alexander Boström Fri, 10 Nov 1995 19:53
Fwd: 2322 SEQUENT PREVIEWS NON-UNIFORM MEMORY ACCESS SYSTEM
#3617
Author: Alexander Boström
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 1995 19:53
125 lines
3609 bytes
Does this mean Be's 8-CPU limitation has become a serious bottleneck?

In article <199510282329.XAA58013@power.globalnews.com>, more
<more@power.globalnews.com> wrote:
>SEQUENT PREVIEWS NON-UNIFORM MEMORY ACCESS SYSTEM
>(October 24th 1995) Sequent Computer Systems Inc has unveiled its
>second generation multiprocessing computer architecture, NUMA-Q. It
>says products using it can be expected in the second half of next
>year. It will be based on Non-Uniform Memory Access and will use
>Intel Corp's Pentium Pro.

>The company says the system will offer ten times the performance of
>current symmetric multiprocessing systems but at prices in keeping
>with the personal computer components it will use. The system's other
>attraction, says the company, is that it offers binary compatibility
>with existing Symmetry servers so Windows NT and Unix will run
>unchanged on it. It says this will give it the edge over massively
>parallel architectures for which programmers have found it difficult
>to develop applications that truly take advantage of the parallelism.
>The first machine is likely to be a 256-processor affair.

>Data General Corp, which is also working on Non Uniform Memory
>Access, is on schedule to beat Sequent to market, but is planning a
>32-way machine.

>Sequent's architecture is the culmination of two years' work in which
>it built a system to use Intel's quad boards. In the machine, each
>processor has its own cache memory and the caches talk to each other
>via IQ-Link to create the illusion of shared system main memory.
>IQ-Link is the intelligent interconnect the company has designed
>which it describes as a "grown up cache controller" and which avoids
>the bottlenecks associated with symmetric multiprocessing. Sequent
>says the system will scale to hundreds of processors, with no visible
>bottleneck and that it provides an easy-to-programme environment.

>The system is neither shared everything, as in symmetric
>multiprocessing, nor shared nothing, as in parallel, but
>'shared-when-you-want'. It can configure itself dynamically under
>software control, says the company.

>The quad boards - symmetric multiprocessing blocks that are
>configured into what is essentially a parallel structure - are
>expected in about nine months. Sequent says that with their launch,
>symmetric multiprocessing on the desktop will become a commodity
>overnight. The boards have been designed by Intel with technological
>input from Sequent, which has tinkered with them, putting the
>on-board memory and input-output closer to each processor so there is
>no need to go out and use bandwidth on the interconnect between the
>quad-processor modules. Around this configuration of boards runs a
>Fibre Channel input-output system that links into every board giving
>each processor direct access to every peripheral attached to the
>system. It is not a backplane, says Sequent, but a daisychain
>connection between quads.
>(C) Computergram International | Select 5000 for more information






































































Hejsan. :)
Thread Navigation

This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.

Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.

Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.

Back to All Threads