Article View: comp.sys.sequent
Article #157Re: Dynix licensing
From: Jeff d'Arcy
Date: Wed, 04 Oct 1989 13:35
Date: Wed, 04 Oct 1989 13:35
12 lines
889 bytes
889 bytes
pcg@thor.cs.aber.ac.uk (Piercarlo Grandi):
> authorized) want to make money. You might want instead to
> investigate on getting MACH sources for the Sequent, especially
On the other hand, if you don't want to fiddle with sources and
want a good version of Mach running on a shared-memory symmetric
multiprocessor, I have a suggestion for you... :-)
(Check out the .sig if you don't get it)
Jeff d'Arcy jdarcy@encore.com (508) 460-0500
Encore has provided the medium, but the message remains my own
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<10076@multimax.Encore.COM>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!purdue!bu-cs!encore!pinocchio.encore.comReferences:
<PCG.89Oct3143413@thor.cs.aber.ac.uk>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!purdue!bu-cs!encore!pinocchio.encore.com From: jdarcy@pinocchio.encore.com (Jeff d'Arcy) Newsgroups: comp.sys.sequent Subject: Re: Dynix licensing Message-ID: <10076@multimax.Encore.COM> Date: 4 Oct 89 13:35:01 GMT References: <PCG.89Oct3143413@thor.cs.aber.ac.uk> Sender: news@Encore.COM Lines: 12