Re: Mach as a replacement O/S (was obsolete software)

Article View: comp.sys.sequent

Article #524

#524

From: Carl S. Gutekunst
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 1991 21:49

11 lines
812 bytes

>A system such as OSF/2 may turn to be highly portable and with much of the
>work already done by OSF maintenance on the side of the Sequent could be
>much reduced.

Haw! Haw! Haw! Haw!!!! *Guffaw* *Gasp* *Giggle*

Oops, I better restrain myself.

Never worked for a system vendor, I see. :-)

<csg>

Technical Details

Message-ID: <148150@pyramid.pyramid.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!hplabs!pyramid!csg

References: <ZOO.91Mar11005948@grumpy.spa.umn.edu> <1991Mar13.221353@arp.anu.edu.au> <1991Mar13.222938@arp.anu.edu.au>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!hplabs!pyramid!csg
From: csg@pyramid.pyramid.com (Carl S. Gutekunst)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.sequent
Subject: Re: Mach as a replacement O/S (was obsolete software)
Message-ID: <148150@pyramid.pyramid.com>
Date: 13 Mar 91 21:49:44 GMT
References: <ZOO.91Mar11005948@grumpy.spa.umn.edu> <1991Mar13.221353@arp.anu.edu.au> <1991Mar13.222938@arp.anu.edu.au>
Organization: Pyramid Technology Corp., Mountain View, CA
Lines: 11

Reply to Parent Message