Article View: comp.sys.sequent
Article #667Re: BIND and resolver routines under Dynix 3.0.4
From: Lyndon Nerenberg
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 1988 22:30
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 1988 22:30
15 lines
1077 bytes
1077 bytes
In article <44375@beno.seismo.CSS.GOV> rick@seismo.CSS.GOV (Rick Adams) writes:
>The Sequent could be a wonderful networking machine if they would let
>the engineers keep the networking software within 3-4 years of current
>technology.
>
>Sequent has a very nice hardware base, but I really wish I could
>call the software something better than "adequate".
What was the criteria used to select the system that would run uunet?
It seems to me that a reliable and complete set of networking tools
would be of prime importance in this application.
--
{alberta,pyramid,uunet}!ncc!lyndon lyndon@Nexus.CA
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<10344@ncc.Nexus.CA>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!alberta!ncc!lyndonReferences:
<143@daitc.ARPA> <2961@cs.utexas.edu> <4080@oxtrap.UUCP> <44375@beno.seismo.CSS.GOV>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!att!alberta!ncc!lyndon From: lyndon@ncc.Nexus.CA (Lyndon Nerenberg) Newsgroups: comp.sys.sequent Subject: Re: BIND and resolver routines under Dynix 3.0.4 Message-ID: <10344@ncc.Nexus.CA> Date: 17 Jul 88 22:30:20 GMT References: <143@daitc.ARPA> <2961@cs.utexas.edu> <4080@oxtrap.UUCP> <44375@beno.seismo.CSS.GOV> Reply-To: lyndon@ncc.nexus.ca (Lyndon Nerenberg) Organization: Nexus Computing Inc. Lines: 15