s_lock vs S_LOCK

Article View: comp.sys.sequent

Article #693

#693

From: Steve Hammond
Date: Wed, 07 Sep 1988 17:31

18 lines
1314 bytes

I am having trouble using s_lock() vs. the in-line macro S_LOCK.
I have looked at the code for the macro but don't see the
problem.  I have been using s_lock() without any trouble but
felt I could use the speed up of having in-line macro instead
of making the 100k procedure calls that my application required.

Rather than fill this newsgroup with details of my probelm, I would
prefer to correspond with someone via e-mail and then I will post
a summary of what I have learned...  So, if you have successfully
used S_LOCK could you let me know and I will tell you what
behaviour I am observing.  I appreciate the help.  Thanks.

   Steve


--------------------------------------------------------------------
     Steve Hammond   RPI CS Dept.      hammonds@turing.cs.rpi.edu
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1138@imagine.PAWL.RPI.EDU>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!mordor!joyce!ames!nrl-cmf!ukma!psuvm.bitnet!cunyvm!nyser!itsgw!imagine!turing.cs.rpi.edu!hammonds

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!mordor!joyce!ames!nrl-cmf!ukma!psuvm.bitnet!cunyvm!nyser!itsgw!imagine!turing.cs.rpi.edu!hammonds
From: hammonds@turing.cs.rpi.edu (Steve Hammond)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.sequent
Subject: s_lock vs S_LOCK
Message-ID: <1138@imagine.PAWL.RPI.EDU>
Date: 7 Sep 88 17:31:21 GMT
Sender: news@imagine.PAWL.RPI.EDU
Reply-To: hammonds@turing.cs.rpi.edu (Steve Hammond)
Organization: RPI CS Dept.
Lines: 17