Re: Mkfs/Inode density

Article View: comp.sys.sequent

Article #763

#763

From: Chris Seabrook
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 1989 09:35

9 lines
807 bytes

We have also recently added a swallow 5 to our sequent configuration. The work
we are using the new disk for is somewhat indoe hungry (lots of symlinks) so
I made the filesystem using:

	mkfs -b 4096 -f 512 -c 4 -i 2048 zd8c zdswallow5

and ended up with a better inode <-> disk block ratio than on the standard
swallow. I guess -c 6 will be more what you are looking for though.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <701@root44.co.uk>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!mcvax!ukc!stl!stc!root44!cds

References: <1419@orion.cf.uci.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!mcvax!ukc!stl!stc!root44!cds
From: cds@root.co.uk (Chris Seabrook)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.sequent
Subject: Re: Mkfs/Inode density
Summary: inodes on swallow 5
Keywords: inode swallow5 mkfs
Message-ID: <701@root44.co.uk>
Date: 13 Feb 89 09:35:11 GMT
References: <1419@orion.cf.uci.edu>
Reply-To: cds@root44.UUCP (Chris Seabrook)
Organization: UniSoft Ltd, London, England
Lines: 9

Reply to Parent Message