🚀 go-pugleaf

From article <RICH.89May9184106@sendai.sendai.ann-arbor.mi.us>, by rich@sendai.sendai.ann-arbor.mi.us (K. Richard Magill):
> In article <13274@paris.ics.uci.edu> nagel@beaver.ics.uci.edu (Mark Nagel) writes:
> 
>    It was pointed out to me that there is an error in top.local.h for the
>    sequent -- VMUNIX should be defined as /dynix not /vmunix.
> 
> Many makefiles use the heuristic that the presence of /vmunix means
> a berkeley machine.  So many, in fact, that long ago I did a "ln -s
> /dynix /vmunix".  Solved a number of headaches.

I have tried to compile top2.5 on a Sequent Symmetry S81, but it fails:

- cc -c -O   -DTable_size=449 -DDefault_TOPN=-1 -DDefault_DELAY=1 top.c
- cc -O     -c display.c
- cc -O     -c kernel.c
- "kernel.c", line 114: p_addr undefined
- "kernel.c", line 114: member of structure or union required
- "display.c", line 266: CPUSTATES undefined
- "display.c", line 288: CPUSTATES undefined
- "display.c", line 304: CPUSTATES undefined
- "display.c", line 542: p_tsize undefined
- "display.c", line 542: member of structure or union required
- "top.c", line 1180: p_tsize undefined
- "top.c", line 1180: member of structure or union required
- "top.c", line 1181: member of structure or union required

Can someone please tell me what i am doing wrong ? - It seems that
everone else has succeeded in compiling top on a sequent, or is there
only a better version of top than 2.5 ??

				Toerless Eckert
				(eckert@immd4.informatik.uni-erlangen.de)