🚀 go-pugleaf

gustav@arp.anu.edu.au (Zdzislaw Meglicki) writes:

>Aha, one more thing... Someone suggested here in comp.sys.sequent
>that Sequent should embrace OSF/2. What Sequent could do is to 
>provide two alternative OSs - much like DIGITAL (VMS and Ultrix)
>or CRAY (once upon a time). A system such as OSF/2 may turn to 
>be highly portable and with much of the work already done by OSF
>maintenance on the side of the Sequent could be much reduced.

	Might one be so blunt as to point out that OSF/2 does not exist!
Heck, OSF only released OSF/1 last November. Realistically, don't expect
OSF/2 for another 18-24 months, perhaps another year beyond that for it
to appear as a robust, commercial product.

-----------  
uunet!media!ka3ovk!raysnec!shwake				shwake@rsxtech