Thread View: comp.sys.sequent
3 messages
3 total messages
Started by Mike Iglesias
Wed, 27 Sep 1989 19:38
Problems using Sequent Symmetry as NFS server?
Author: Mike Iglesias
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 1989 19:38
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 1989 19:38
27 lines
1701 bytes
1701 bytes
We're using a 4 processor Sequent Symmetry system as a NFS server for various systems (Sun 3s, Sun 4s, Sun 386s, etc) around campus. Our campus network has different areas divided into subnets with each subnet served by a cisco router, and the routers connected by a fiber optic backbone. On occasion (more often than we'd like), the client systems will start printing messages about the NFS server not responding. This goes on for about 45 seconds or so, and then the client can talk to the server again. We don't see this on Suns that are on the same subnet as the Sequent server, which could indicate it's a network problem. The problem is that we don't really know how to go about figuring out whether it's a network problem or a problem with the Sequent or Sequent's NFS product. We've tried playing with the NFS timeout and retransmission values, but we haven't been very successful in curing the problem without using somewhat high values (timeouts of 2 seconds and retransmissions set to 9). If anyone has any experience with Sequent's NFS product they'd like to relate or on how we can figure out where the problem is, please let me know. Thanks in advance, Mike Iglesias University of California, Irvine
Re: Problems using Sequent Symmetry as NFS server?
Author: Carl S. Gutekunst
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 1989 23:20
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 1989 23:20
32 lines
2283 bytes
2283 bytes
In article <3022@orion.cf.uci.edu> iglesias@orion.oac.uci.edu (Mike Iglesias) writes: >On occasion (more often than we'd like), the client systems will start >printing messages about the NFS server not responding. This goes on >for about 45 seconds or so, and then the client can talk to the server >again. We don't see this on Suns that are on the same subnet as the >Sequent server, which could indicate it's a network problem. That's the key that tells you it's a routing problem. You can easily verify this by attempting an rlogin at the same time as NFS is having trouble. If the rlogin just sits there, then routing is the problem. Whether it's something you can easily fix is less clear. Older versions of routed, the route daemon, are known for going catatonic, spitting up, and other rude behavior that can result in networks temporarilly being separated from each other; and last I knew, Dynix was still using the 4.2BSD routed. Also SunOS older than, oh, 3.4 or so. Figuring out who dropped what involves using netstat -r to determine which routes are vanishing at which nodes. If you can find a TCP/IP wizard to watch the netstat output while you are having troubles, you may be able to find a single node that is eating routes because of some trivial configuration problem. More often than not, it will be the gateway machine itself that is having problems. The draconion solution is to use static routing, instead of dynamic. You then use the route(8) command to add the routes by hand in /etc/rc.boot, and do *not* start routed(8). It actually works very well if your network is small and you don't change the topology very often. If it's the gateway that is dropping routes, then you use static routing on the gateway, and dynamic on all other machines. <csg>
Re: Problems using Sequent Symmetry as NFS server?
Author: John T Kohl
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 1989 13:45
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 1989 13:45
23 lines
1854 bytes
1854 bytes
In article <3022@orion.cf.uci.edu> iglesias@orion.cf.uci.edu (Mike Iglesias) writes: On occasion (more often than we'd like), the client systems will start printing messages about the NFS server not responding. This goes on for about 45 seconds or so, and then the client can talk to the server again. one thing to look at is your NFS read/write block size. We found here at MIT that our network router software/hardware had some problems with the 8k packets normally used (which must be fragmented, and usually are sent out back-to-back at maximum ethernet packet size). Although the network group here has finally fixed the software, Athena has for a long time used 1k read/write packets to avoid excercising this bug. I have seen this problem both with MIT's custom C-gateway code and with a vendor's stock hardware/software solution with very similar topology (lots of IP subnets on ethernet, connected to routers which sit on a central fiber-optic campus spine). -- John Kohl <jtkohl@ATHENA.MIT.EDU> or <jtkohl@Kolvir.Brookline.MA.US> Digital Equipment Corporation/Project Athena (The above opinions are MINE. Don't put my words in somebody else's mouth!)
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads