Thread View: comp.sys.sequent
4 messages
4 total messages
Started by Carl Langford s
Tue, 13 Oct 1992 18:45
sluggish S81
Author: Carl Langford s
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1992 18:45
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1992 18:45
16 lines
1272 bytes
1272 bytes
We have a S81 running ptx v1.3. Once in a while, the system becomes quite sluggish. sar shows that the system disk (zd0) is 100% busy. The disk contains /, /usr and two swap partitions. sar also shows that there is no swapping on this system. /tmp is mounted as a separate partition on a different disk. We have no user accounts on /usr, and, as far as we can tell, have no applications using / or /usr except for normal system activity. Can anyone provide some suggestions on what other things we should look for? The machine has been set up for timesharing (as opposed to commercial), has 14 processors and 144 meg of RAM. It typically supports 100+ users and the slowdown does not seem to be related to user load. ==== Carl Langford email: carl@mach1.wlu.ca Wilfrid Laurier University phone: 519-884-1973 ext 2270 75 University Ave W fax : 519-886-9351 Waterloo, Ontario, Canada N2L 3C5
Re: sluggish S81
Author: Robert Winter
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1992 16:50
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1992 16:50
31 lines
1866 bytes
1866 bytes
clangfor@mach1.wlu.ca (Carl Langford s) writes: >We have a S81 running ptx v1.3. Once in a while, the system becomes quite >sluggish. sar shows that the system disk (zd0) is 100% busy. The disk >contains /, /usr and two swap partitions. sar also shows that there is no >swapping on this system. /tmp is mounted as a separate partition on a >different disk. We have no user accounts on /usr, and, as far as we can >tell, have no applications using / or /usr except for normal system >activity. Can anyone provide some suggestions on what other things we should >look for? The machine has been set up for timesharing (as opposed to >commercial), has 14 processors and 144 meg of RAM. It typically supports >100+ users and the slowdown does not seem to be related to user load. Swapping is not the only thing that would bring a system to its knees. You might check the monitor program for excessive paging. If this is the case then your vmtune resident set size might be set too small. You also might want to move one of you swap devices to another drive. I typically only have one swap device per spindle. If you still have problems, you can also move /usr to a different drive. I would bet that it is the paging problem though. -- Robert Winter Sequent Computer Systems Costa Mesa, CA winter@sequent.com disclaimer: Opinions expressed here are my own. Use at your own risk, etc. etc.
Re: sluggish S81
Author: Simon Marshall
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1992 10:05
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1992 10:05
19 lines
1503 bytes
1503 bytes
In article <Bw2pG2.IAz@mach1.wlu.ca> clangfor@mach1.wlu.ca (Carl Langford s) writes: >We have a S81 running ptx v1.3. Once in a while, the system becomes quite >sluggish. sar shows that the system disk (zd0) is 100% busy. The disk >contains /, /usr and two swap partitions. sar also shows that there is no >swapping on this system. /tmp is mounted as a separate partition on a >different disk. Nobody is shmallocing huge amounts of shared memory, are they? I'm not sure if this fits your problem, as shbrk() is likely to get stuff from elsewhere, and I know nothing about ptx. But on Dynix, shared memory may be allocated from /usr/tmp if it can't get it from $TMPPATH, ./ or ~/ first. It looks in /usr/tmp before /tmp, according to shbrk(p). It wouldn't show up as a file in the file system, of course, you'd have to go poking around to find it. Hope it's some help, Simon. -- Simon Marshall, Dept. of Computer Science, University of Hull, Hull HU6 7RX, UK "Football isn't about life and death. It's more important than that." Bill Email: S.Marshall@Hull.ac.uk Phone: +44 482 465181 Fax: 466666 Shankley
Re: sluggish S81
Author: John "Just Say Noe" Kramer
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 1992 18:28
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 1992 18:28
17 lines
1635 bytes
1635 bytes
In article <5934@mccuts.uts.mcc.ac.uk> ehgasm2@uts.mcc.ac.uk (Simon Marshall) writes: >In article <Bw2pG2.IAz@mach1.wlu.ca> clangfor@mach1.wlu.ca (Carl Langford s) writes: > >Nobody is shmallocing huge amounts of shared memory, are they? I'm not sure if >this fits your problem, as shbrk() is likely to get stuff from elsewhere, and I >know nothing about ptx. But on Dynix, shared memory may be allocated from >/usr/tmp if it can't get it from $TMPPATH, ./ or ~/ first. It looks in >/usr/tmp before /tmp, according to shbrk(p). It wouldn't show up as a file in >the file system, of course, you'd have to go poking around to find it. > >Hope it's some help, Simon. The model is different on PTX in that shared memory is not mapped through the file system anymore. It is mapped directly into swap. /usr/tmp was hardcoded into the library routines that front calls to mmap() under Dynix 3. Under PTX they appear as 'real' system calls. Would suggest evaluating paging activity, see vmtune(8).
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads