Thread View: comp.sys.sequent
9 messages
9 total messages
Started by Dana Roode
Sun, 02 Oct 1988 22:11
Third Party Disc Experience on Sequent systems
Author: Dana Roode
Date: Sun, 02 Oct 1988 22:11
Date: Sun, 02 Oct 1988 22:11
10 lines
701 bytes
701 bytes
We need to add some additional disc to our Sequent Symmetry system,
and are wondering if it makes sense to look into third party
disc. Does anyone at other Sequent sites have specific experience
in using non-Sequent disc?
Dana Roode
UC Irvine Computing Facility
--
Dana Roode
Re: Third Party Disc Experience on Sequ
Author: pwolfe
Date: Mon, 03 Oct 1988 12:28
Date: Mon, 03 Oct 1988 12:28
20 lines
1423 bytes
1423 bytes
Sure, it's worth looking into. Sequent charges about $20,000 for a Fujitsu M2344K (550 Mb formatted) disk drive, with mounting rack and power supply. I get these disks from a third party supplier for $8,000, complete. The disks from Sequent come formatted and tested, and are easier to install, but we've saved $12,000 on each of the eight drives I've installed, which I feel is worth the extra time and hassle involved. Installation the drives and cables takes about 1.5 hours, formatting takes between 3 and 5 hours per drive, depending on the total number of errors. The formatting procedure from Sequent's DYNIX Administration manual is correct and complete. If anyone is interested in more detailed information, I will mail or post my written procedure for purchasing and installing M2344K's on a Sequent system. Patrick Wolfe System Manager, Kuck and Associates, Inc. Patrick.Wolfe@kailand.kai.com -or- kailand!Patrick.Wolfe
Re: Third Party Disc Experience on Sequent systems
Author: Peter Craine
Date: Mon, 03 Oct 1988 18:01
Date: Mon, 03 Oct 1988 18:01
41 lines
1931 bytes
1931 bytes
In article <1049@orion.cf.uci.edu>, roode@orion.cf.uci.edu (Dana Roode) writes: > We need to add some additional disc to our Sequent Symmetry system, > and are wondering if it makes sense to look into third party > disc. Does anyone at other Sequent sites have specific experience > in using non-Sequent disc? > > Dana Roode > UC Irvine Computing Facility > > -- > Dana Roode We at CLSI (a Sequent OEM) have added several of the CDC disks: 9715 - 340 MB (FSD) 9771 - 800 MB (XMD) 9720 - 368 MB and 850 MB (EMD) We will soon be working on the 9720 series 1.2 Gig drive. These drives work very well on the DCC (firmware version 12 or later). BUT!!!! The DCC is a VERY intelligent controller. So intelligent, you have to be intimately familiar with it and the drive to get the timing right. We had to take a three-day course from Sequent to figure this whole thing out. Let's just say that adding drives is a non-trivial project. Of course, theoretically, you could add any SMD-interface drive to the DCC if you had enough information. Sequent supports many of the Fujitsu drives. These drives are (among) the best on the market (in terms of reliability). [forgive the editorializing here; I've been a fan of Fuji for some time]. I hope these idle wanderings of the mind help. If I can help you with specific questions, send me some mail. Peter Craine ..!harvard!bbn!clsib21!peter [bah! who needs a .signature]
Re: Third Party Disc Experience on Sequent systems
Author: Rich Loo
Date: Tue, 04 Oct 1988 02:21
Date: Tue, 04 Oct 1988 02:21
47 lines
2495 bytes
2495 bytes
In article <1049@orion.cf.uci.edu> roode@orion.cf.uci.edu (Dana Roode) writes:
>We need to add some additional disc to our Sequent Symmetry system,
>and are wondering if it makes sense to look into third party
>disc. Does anyone at other Sequent sites have specific experience
>in using non-Sequent disc?
>
> Dana Roode
> UC Irvine Computing Facility
>
>--
>Dana Roode
We use a lot of System Industries equipment on our Symmetry S81
(upgraded from a Balance 21k). As far as disk drives go, we have
used the SI83, SI93, Swallows and Eagles from SI with no problems.
The SI83 is a 690 megabyte (unformatted) dual density Swallow that
fits two to a tray 1/2 the height of an Eagle (so 4 SI83s will fit
in the footprint of an Eagle). The SI93 is actually a NEC D2363
(1.132 GB unformatted). Two of these will fit in the footprint of
an Eagle. Access times for the SI83 and SI93 are 16 ms and 15 ms
respectively. The SI Swallows and Eagles are identical to what
Sequent supplies.
We had to update the partition table of the zd disk driver (3.0.4
on up) to make it work with the NEC drive (no source needed).
The SI83 will work with the stock 3.0.4 on up.
Right now we have 4 SI83s, 8 SI93s, 1 Sequent Swallow and 1 SI Swallow
(as a backup for the one Sequent disk), about 11 gigabytes of disk space.
The only drawbacks are that we have yet to figure out how to run Sequent's
disk diagnostics on the SI83 or SI93 and it takes 1/2 the night to format
an NEC drive.
We've also interfaced the SI STC tri-density 125 ips 9-track tape drive
and SI line printer (a Fujitsu M3043) on the Symmetry. If anyone is
interested in any of this, drop me a line.
I'd also like to know what other 3rd party equipment people are using on
their Symmetry or Balance.
Richard Loo UUCP: ..!{oberon,elroy}!hacgate!rich
(213) 648-0239 Internet: rich@hacgate.scg.hac.com
Hughes Aircraft Company
PO Box 92919 S65/J305
Los Angeles, Ca 90009
Re: Third Party Disc Experience on Sequ
Author: pwolfe
Date: Tue, 04 Oct 1988 14:19
Date: Tue, 04 Oct 1988 14:19
28 lines
1891 bytes
1891 bytes
/* Written 1:01 pm Oct 3, 1988 by peter@clsib21.UUCP in kailand:comp.sys.sequent */ > > BUT!!!! The DCC is a VERY intelligent controller. So intelligent, you have > to be intimately familiar with it and the drive to get the timing right. > > We had to take a three-day course from Sequent to figure this whole thing > out. Let's just say that adding drives is a non-trivial project. > > Of course, theoretically, you could add any SMD-interface drive to the DCC > if you had enough information. Adding disk drives is ONLY non-trivial if you try to add drives that Sequent doesn't already support. A quick peek into /etc/disktab shows which drives they currently support on the DCC: Fuji M2333K, M2351A (eagle), M2344K, M2382K, CDC 9715-340, and 9771-800. Adding those drives is relatively trivial, compared to adding unsupported drives. One problem (detailed in a talk given by Purdue University at the 1987 Sequent User's Group meeting) is that the disk format programs Sequent delivers has the drive parameters hard coded in, instead of reading them from a user-editable table. So even if you know all the information that the format program needs, you need the *source* code to be able to add drives. This eliminated any chance we had for adding non-supported drives. Patrick Wolfe System Manager, Kuck and Associates, Inc. Patrick.Wolfe@kailand.kai.com -or- kailand!Patrick.Wolfe
Re: Third Party Disc Experience on Sequent systems
Author: Ronald O. Christian
Date: Tue, 04 Oct 1988 20:43
Date: Tue, 04 Oct 1988 20:43
16 lines
1059 bytes
1059 bytes
In article <919@clsib21.UUCP> peter@clsib21.UUCP (Peter Craine) writes:
>Sequent supports many of the Fujitsu drives. These drives are (among) the
>best on the market (in terms of reliability). [forgive the editorializing
>here; I've been a fan of Fuji for some time].
Ahem! Fuji makes film, not disk drives.
Ron
--
Ronald O. Christian (Fujitsu America Inc., San Jose, Calif.)
{amdahl, pyramid, sun, unisoft, uunet}!fai!ronc -or- ronc@fai.com
Calling all Fujitsu Usenet sites! Contact fai!ronc or
ronc@fai.com to establish uucp connection.
Re: Third Party Disc Experience on Sequent systems
Author: Kevin C. Smallwood
Date: Wed, 05 Oct 1988 15:24
Date: Wed, 05 Oct 1988 15:24
29 lines
2317 bytes
2317 bytes
In article <2400024@kailand> pwolfe@kailand.KAI.COM writes:
>
>One problem (detailed in a talk given by Purdue University at the 1987
>Sequent User's Group meeting) is that the disk format programs Sequent
>delivers has the drive parameters hard coded in, instead of reading them from
>a user-editable table. So even if you know all the information that the format
>program needs, you need the *source* code to be able to add drives. This
>eliminated any chance we had for adding non-supported drives.
This is no longer true. In the *binary* distribution of the DYNIX V3.0,
the proper files are available. If you look in /usr/sys/stand/conf_zdc.c,
you will find the table that we used to have to change by only having the
source code available. In fact, Sequent now has a Makefile available in
/usr/sys/stand to remake the stand-alone programs (like the formatter --
zdformat -- if you plan to boot off of the device, also remake "boot" and
"zdboot" -- there are other caveats if you are interested). In conf_zdc.c,
you need to come up with the magic configuration numbers that are described
in the zdinfo structure (described in /usr/sys/stand/zdc.h -- but the most
important chunk -- zdcdd -- is described in /usr/sys/zdc/zdc.h). One of
the Sequent systems (this happened to be a Symmetry) at Purdue (the
Department of Computer Science) was able to add support for a CDC 9766
essentially following the directions that Mike Marsh and I laid out in the
paper with only the "binary" distribution (not source code) with DYNIX
V3.0, so I know it is now possible. Thanks to Sequent for adding this
support!
Kevin C. Smallwood Internet: kcs@j.cc.purdue.edu
Manager of UNIX Systems UUCP: ...!{pur-ee,purdue}!kcs
Purdue University Computing Center
Re: Third Party Disc Experience on Sequ
Author: Peter Craine
Date: Wed, 05 Oct 1988 20:41
Date: Wed, 05 Oct 1988 20:41
26 lines
1459 bytes
1459 bytes
> > One problem (detailed in a talk given by Purdue University at the 1987 > Sequent User's Group meeting) is that the disk format programs Sequent > delivers has the drive parameters hard coded in, instead of reading them from > a user-editable table. So even if you know all the information that the format > program needs, you need the *source* code to be able to add drives. This > eliminated any chance we had for adding non-supported drives. > Yes, you need some source, but the only source you need is in the distribution kits. There are five files to modify: /sys/stand/conf_zd.c /sys/zdc/zdc.h /sys/conf/conf_zd.c /sys/conf/controller.balance (only potentially) /etc/disktab The real problem is not having the source, but understanding what must be changed/added to support the drives. In particular, /sys/stand/conf_zd.c is the "non-trivial" portion of adding support I alluded to in my previous posting. So, you don't need any more source, but this doesn't make the problem any less severe. Peter Craine
Re: Third Party Disc Experience on Sequ
Author: pwolfe
Date: Fri, 07 Oct 1988 18:00
Date: Fri, 07 Oct 1988 18:00
9 lines
770 bytes
770 bytes
When the Sequent User Group met in 1987, the current release of DYNIX was V2.1. I was not aware that things had changed with V3.0. Thanks you Sequent for making this code available! Patrick Wolfe System Manager, Kuck and Associates, Inc. Patrick.Wolfe@kailand.kai.com -or- kailand!Patrick.Wolfe
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads