Thread View: comp.sys.sequent
5 messages
5 total messages
Started by Edmund C. Lam
Tue, 03 Jan 1989 13:14
bug in Dynix C compiler.
Author: Edmund C. Lam
Date: Tue, 03 Jan 1989 13:14
Date: Tue, 03 Jan 1989 13:14
28 lines
1234 bytes
1234 bytes
I found a C compiler bug in the balance C compiler. We don't have software
support, but here is the bug warning for anyone listening.
Dynix V3.0.12 Oct 5/88.
Category: Software
System Type: Balance
Id: 51079 24576 /bin/cc (Feb 6/88)
Description:
The following structure definition causes /bin/cc to complain about a
C syntax error:
struct foo {
int private;
};
The bug is triggered by the keyword "private" inside a structure
declaration. Using "private" outside a structure is fine.
This bug was found while building XV11R3 (xdm client).
The easy solution is to change declarations of "private" to something else.
BTW:
Does anyone know sequent's bug report mail address? I just want to make
/usr/bin/mailbug work. Thanks.
--
-Edmund C. Lam (University of Waterloo)
<eclam@maytag.waterloo.edu>
Re: bug in Dynix C compiler.
Author: Paul M. Aoki
Date: Wed, 04 Jan 1989 10:47
Date: Wed, 04 Jan 1989 10:47
18 lines
1157 bytes
1157 bytes
In article <ECLAM.89Jan3081428@maytag.waterloo.edu> eclam@maytag.waterloo.edu (Edmund C. Lam) writes: >Dynix V3.0.12 Oct 5/88. >Category: Software >System Type: Balance [ Aren't 3.0.4 and 3.0.14 the last Balance releases? I thought 3.0.12 was a Symmetry release. Or am I really confused. ] Anyone know when the next Symmetry update is coming out? > Does anyone know sequent's bug report mail address? I just want to make > /usr/bin/mailbug work. I believe tektronix!sequent!pts works. ---------------- Paul M. Aoki CS Division, Dept. of EECS // UCB // Berkeley, CA 94720 (415) 642-1863 aoki@postgres.Berkeley.EDU ...!ucbvax!aoki
Re: bug in Dynix C compiler.
Author: MFHorn
Date: Wed, 04 Jan 1989 20:08
Date: Wed, 04 Jan 1989 20:08
31 lines
1535 bytes
1535 bytes
> I found a C compiler bug in the balance C compiler.
>
> The following structure definition causes /bin/cc to complain about a
>
> struct foo {
> int private;
> };
>
> The bug is triggered by the keyword "private" inside a structure
> declaration. Using "private" outside a structure is fine.
>
> The easy solution is to change declarations of "private" to something
> else.
In Dynix C, 'private' is a reserved word. It's used with the parallel
processing libraries. There is another reserved word called 'shared'.
Their both added variable types. The above example is thus equivalent
struct foo {
int long;
};
I'm surprised it allows you to use 'private' as a variable name at all,
even outside a structure. I once tried to use 'auto' as a local variable
name, and it didn't accept that.
--
Andy Rosen | arosen@hawk.ulowell.edu | "I got this guitar and I
ULowell, Box #3031 | ulowell!arosen | learned how to make it
Lowell, Ma 01854 | | talk" -Thunder Road
RD in '88 - The way it should've been
Dynix releases
Author: Gerrit Huizenga
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 1989 04:37
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 1989 04:37
29 lines
1762 bytes
1762 bytes
In article <8571@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU> aoki@postgres.Berkeley.EDU (Paul M. Aoki) writes: > >[ Aren't 3.0.4 and 3.0.14 the last Balance releases? I thought > 3.0.12 was a Symmetry release. Or am I really confused. ] > >Anyone know when the next Symmetry update is coming out? > >---------------- >Paul M. Aoki >CS Division, Dept. of EECS // UCB // Berkeley, CA 94720 (415) 642-1863 >aoki@postgres.Berkeley.EDU ...!ucbvax!aoki Dynix releases as I know them... 3.0.12 for the Symmetry, and 3.0.14 for the Balance are *almost* equivilant releases. The differences are those needed to make 3.0.12 work on the balance. There is also a release 3.0.15 which contains the hard quotas which I believe we are beta testing. I haven't yet had a chance to bring up this release yet. There *may* also be a release in the future which incorporates some of the Purdue local modifications which include Dave Stevens' 4.3 Tahoe/Van Jacobsen network improvements and various other bug fixes and 4.3 enhancements for the kernel. Purdue has also ported/merged many/most of the 4.3 BSD user level programs to Dynix. In short, the local version of Dynix is much closer to 4.3. Gerrit Huizenga, Purdue University Computing Center gh3@mentor.cc.purdue.edu
Re: bug in Dynix C compiler.
Author: Bruce
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 1989 01:55
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 1989 01:55
11 lines
773 bytes
773 bytes
Dynix 3.0.12 is latest Symmetry Release. Dynix 3.0.14 is latest Balance Release. To report problems via 'mailbug' you should add "pts:uunet!sequent!pts" to /usr/lib/aliases, or call Sequent Service (800-854-9969) to get a direct connect if you have a Service Contract. -- Ian Johnstone uunet!sequent!ianj Sequent Computer Systems Beaverton, Oregon
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads