Thread View: comp.sys.sgi.apps
8 messages
8 total messages
Started by Ross Dargahi
Sat, 09 Jan 1993 00:31
QuickTime
Author: Ross Dargahi
Date: Sat, 09 Jan 1993 00:31
Date: Sat, 09 Jan 1993 00:31
4 lines
490 bytes
490 bytes
When will Quicktime be available from SGI Ross Dargahi
Re: QuickTime
Author: Roger B.A. Klorese
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 05:43
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 05:43
15 lines
997 bytes
997 bytes
In article <utnn0o4@zola.esd.sgi.com> portuesi@tweezers.esd.sgi.com (Michael Portuesi) writes:
>
>In article <1il6ddINNpih@gazette.bcm.tmc.edu>, rdargahi@wilkins.iaims.bcm.tmc.edu writes:
>>
>> When will Quicktime be available from SGI
>>
>
>When it's ready.
A refreshing change, then, Mike. ;-)
--
ROGER B.A. KLORESE +1 415 ALL-ARFF
rogerk@unpc.QueerNet.ORG {ames,decwrl,pyramid}!sgiblab!unpc!rogerk
"Sometimes you wake up. Sometimes the fall kills you. And sometimes, when
you fall, you fly." -- N. Gaiman
Re: QuickTime
Author: Ross Dargahi
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 22:19
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 22:19
20 lines
1001 bytes
1001 bytes
In article <utnn0o4@zola.esd.sgi.com>, portuesi@tweezers.esd.sgi.com (Michael Portuesi) writes: > > In article <1il6ddINNpih@gazette.bcm.tmc.edu>, rdargahi@wilkins.iaims.bcm.tmc.edu writes: > > > > When will Quicktime be available from SGI > > > > When it's ready. > > -- > Michael Portuesi Silicon Graphics, Inc. portuesi@sgi.com Thank you for that enlightening answer. Many Thanks Ross Dargahi **************************************************************************************
Re: QuickTime
Author: Michael Portuesi
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 17:08
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 17:08
36 lines
1825 bytes
1825 bytes
In article <1jn7hcINN4l9@gazette.bcm.tmc.edu>, rdargahi@wilkins.iaims.bcm.tmc.edu writes: > In article <utnn0o4@zola.esd.sgi.com>, portuesi@tweezers.esd.sgi.com (Michael Portuesi) writes: > > In article <1il6ddINNpih@gazette.bcm.tmc.edu>, rdargahi@wilkins.iaims.bcm.tmc.edu writes: > > > > > > When will Quicktime be available from SGI > > > > > > > When it's ready. > > > > -- > > Michael Portuesi Silicon Graphics, Inc. portuesi@sgi.com > > Thank you for that enlightening answer. > > Many Thanks I did post a longer reply on this topic in comp.sys.sgi.graphics. I'm sorry if you were upset by this response. I appreciate your desire to see QuickTime on our platform, but the reality of the situation is that in order for it to be a product that you're going to be able to use, we have to invest a significant amount of engineering effort into making it work well, and integrated with the movie software which is already available on our system. Finally, SGI employs me to design and develop software products. SGI does not employ me to provide ship dates for unreleased products on Usenet, and in fact many people at SGI would get quite upset with me were I to do so. I hope you found this answer more enlightening than the first. -- Michael Portuesi Silicon Graphics, Inc. portuesi@sgi.com
Re: QuickTime
Author: Guy Brooker
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 18:15
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 18:15
49 lines
2781 bytes
2781 bytes
In article <v6u20sc@zola.esd.sgi.com>, portuesi@tweezers.esd.sgi.com (Michael Portuesi) writes: > > In article <1jn7hcINN4l9@gazette.bcm.tmc.edu>, rdargahi@wilkins.iaims.bcm.tmc.edu writes: > > In article <utnn0o4@zola.esd.sgi.com>, portuesi@tweezers.esd.sgi.com (Michael Portuesi) writes: > > > In article <1il6ddINNpih@gazette.bcm.tmc.edu>, rdargahi@wilkins.iaims.bcm.tmc.edu writes: > > > > > > > > When will Quicktime be available from SGI > > > > > > > > > > When it's ready. > > > > > > -- > > > Michael Portuesi Silicon Graphics, Inc. portuesi@sgi.com > > > > Thank you for that enlightening answer. > > > > Many Thanks > > I did post a longer reply on this topic in comp.sys.sgi.graphics. > I'm sorry Michael, but it seems I am not the only one to have missed your more enlightening reply on Quicktime in comp.sys.sgi.graphics. I read the SGI newsgroups every day, so I am not sure how this has been bypassed, as it is of significant interest to myself and my group. Would it be possible for you to repost this article, as I am sure many people would be very grateful. The fanfare announcement of the Quicktime port sometime ago was enough to push us that little bit further and purchase some Indigos here. We are a little worried at the current silence... Would it be possible for you to outline the levels of integration of Quicktime into IRIX and its supporting applications that are being planned ? - Will files be directly exchangable between Macs and IRIX ? - Will there be support under ImageVision for the Image Compression facilities ? - Will PICTs now be a supported file format ( and in ImageVision ?) - I presume there will be support in Showcase. - Will the programming interface/library be standard, or part of the developers option ? - Will it be possible (even feasable) to show movies on remote X displays ? Guy -- ------------------------------------- Guy Brooker Internet: guy@wm.estec.esa.nl European Space Research and guy@estwm0.dnet.estec.esa.nl Technology Centre (ESTEC) gbrooker@estec.esa.nl Bitnet : gbrooker@estec SPAN : ESTERS::GUY Phone : +31-1719-83611 Fax : +31-1719-85617 Mail : ESTEC JW/WMS, Keplerlaan 1, 2200AG NOORDWIJK, The Netherlands
Re: QuickTime
Author: Vernon Schryver
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 20:55
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 20:55
52 lines
2977 bytes
2977 bytes
In article <C1F9D7.3Ay@wm.estec.esa.nl>, guy@wmsg02.wm.estec.esa.nl (Guy Brooker) writes: > ... > I'm sorry Michael, but it seems I am not the only one to have missed your more > enlightening reply on Quicktime in comp.sys.sgi.graphics. ... > Would it be possible for you to outline the levels of integration of > Quicktime into IRIX and its supporting applications that are being > planned ? > ... Michael can, should, and no doubt will respond or not as he feels appropriate. However, very few of the people with return addresses within sgi.com who post to comp.sys.sgi* can prudently say much about future products, plans, or ideas. Very few of us who post have the authority to offer nondisclosure agreements. Most of us are only soldiers in the trenches. Many of us have worked on projects that have been cancelled, and based just on statistics, it is quite possible that a few of us are now working on something that we will all be surprised to have cancelled. The pain of that is enough. No one likes to have that pain augmented by disappointed customers shouting at Ed and threatening or filing lawsuits about broken promises. There is no such thing as effective net-news disclaimer. An innocent answer can be taken by third parties as an official promise. It is impossible to predict exactly what a future product will do when complete enough to ship. Anyone making a pre-announcement knows that what, if anything, is finally shipped will differ from the current hopes and plans. Thus, almost any pre-announcement is a lie, a statement intended to make someone believe something known to be false, even in those perhaps rare cases when the announcement is a complete statement of current plans. Some companies more regularly "pre-announce", but they do not let the peons do the announcing, because those "truths" must be managed carefully. If you want pre-announcement, it-could-turn-out-to-be-the-truth, your best source is your salescritter. Yes, I know about "non-disclosures", customers who need information for planning, and others who just need to feel the cutting edge. Still, sales people and big bosses are paid to take the risks associated with pre-announcing, and to keep the stories straight. I thought Michael's answer, "when it's ready", was a humorous (because of the name "quicktime") response to a question that might not be answerable here and perhaps should not have been asked here. Vernon Schryver, vjs@sgi.com
Re: QuickTime
Author: Michael Portuesi
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 21:52
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 21:52
38 lines
2089 bytes
2089 bytes
In article <C1F9D7.3Ay@wm.estec.esa.nl>, guy@wmsg02.wm.estec.esa.nl writes: > I'm sorry Michael, but it seems I am not the only one to have > missed your more enlightening reply on Quicktime in > comp.sys.sgi.graphics. What I said in my earlier message in this thread is essentially a shorter version of what I said in comp.sys.sgi.graphics. > The fanfare announcement of the Quicktime port sometime ago was > enough to push us that little bit further and purchase some > Indigos here. We are a little worried at the current silence... You should not be worried. In this case, no news is good news. > Would it be possible for you to outline the levels of > integration of Quicktime into IRIX and its supporting > applications that are being planned ? As Vernon Schryver said in a separate message, I cannot comment on features and availability dates for unreleased products. I do want to point out, however, that if your needs for movies on the Indigo do not include exchange with Macintosh applications, we already provide a Movie Tools pacakge bundled with IRIX 4.0.5F. You get a movie player, an application for creating and editing movies, and a utility for recording live video from the IndigoVideo board. If you own an Indigo and have a maintenance contract for OS releases, simply contact Silicon Graphics and ask for an upgrade to IRIX 4.0.5F. m. -- Michael Portuesi Silicon Graphics, Inc. portuesi@sgi.com
Re: QuickTime
Author: Mark Callow
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 20:48
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 20:48
25 lines
1696 bytes
1696 bytes
In article <C1F9D7.3Ay@wm.estec.esa.nl>, guy@wmsg02.wm.estec.esa.nl writes:
>
> The fanfare announcement of the Quicktime port sometime ago was enough to
> push us that little bit further and purchase some Indigos here. We are a
> little worried at the current silence...
>
The original contract was arranged by marketing people who also made
all the fanfare. Since then we have been facing the engineering
reality. The C source code we received from Apple is incredibly Macintosh
specific and difficult to port. The compression code is all written in 68xxx
assembler. We are essentially having to write rather than port the quicktime
code. There will be no further announcements until we have a product to
ship.
P.S. Could you find a news poster/editor that doesn't write such long
lines.
----
From the TARDIS of Mark Callow
msc@ramoth.sgi.com, ...{ames,decwrl}!sgi!msc
"and a wonderful method (reorganization) can be for creating the illusion
of progress while producing confusion, inefficiency, and demoralization."
- Petronius Arbiter, ?? AD.
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads