Article View: comp.sys.sgi.misc
Article #21Re: Is RWHOD working as advertised?
From: Andrew Cherenson
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 00:32
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 00:32
22 lines
1616 bytes
1616 bytes
In article <34735@adm.brl.mil> ACCESS@krdc.int.alcan.ca (Shawn Allin - Alcan KRDC Computer Services) writes: >Recently, we fired up a RWHOD server on our Vax that was ported by Terry >Kennedy. We were perplexed at first by the seeming randomness of which >machines it saw and which it didn't. I've tracked it down to the fact that >the SGI's are broadcasting the information with the fully qualified domain >name, rather than just the host name portion as the man pages says it >should. This causes the Vax to attempt to write files of the form: >rwho.host.domain.name > >which of couse is invalid under VMS. As I stated earlier, the man pages >for RWHOD indicate that it gets the hostname of the machine with >gethostname. Here is a quote from the man page: > > "The host name included is that returned by the gethostname(2) system call, >with any trailing domain name omitted." > >I know that I can probably fix the VMS side to do exactly this, but I'd >prefer it to be fixed on the SGI's if indeed it is a bug. The workaround is not use the FQDN in /etc/sys_id. Note that sending the FQDN is useful in networks with multiple domains and use rwhod in multicast mode.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<tnsabd8@sgi.sgi.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!spool.mu.edu!olivea!sgigate!sgi!xingping.esd.sgi.com!arcShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!spool.mu.edu!olivea!sgigate!sgi!xingping.esd.sgi.com!arc From: arc@xingping.esd.sgi.com (Andrew Cherenson) Newsgroups: comp.sys.sgi.misc Subject: Re: Is RWHOD working as advertised? Message-ID: <tnsabd8@sgi.sgi.com> Date: 18 Dec 92 00:32:21 GMT Sender: arc@xingping.esd.sgi.com Organization: Silicon Graphics, Inc. Mountain View, CA Lines: 22