Article View: comp.sys.sgi.misc
Article #409Re: WorkShop won't work with non-SGI compilers?
From: Martin Knoblauch
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 1993 09:53
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 1993 09:53
46 lines
3081 bytes
3081 bytes
In article <MUTS.93Nov13001723@compi.hobby.nl>, muts@compi.hobby.nl (Peter Mutsaers) writes: |> >> On Wed, 10 Nov 1993 21:15:58 GMT, przemek@rrdbartok.nist.gov |> >> (Przemek Klosowski) said: |> |> PK> Would Workshop and SGI cc use proprietary extensions to the |> PK> executable format? Does anyone know if there is a patch or |> PK> workaround to be used with gcc? |> |> SGI uses proprietary extensions more and more, and I am beginning to |> regret more and more that we ever bought SGI. There is no workaround |> as far as I know. |> -- |> _______________________________________________________________ |> Peter Mutsaers, Bunnik (Ut), the Netherlands. After reading the original posting I would like to add two comments: a) I believe it is reasonable that SGI (we) can only support our own products. GCC is great (especially in situations where the vendor supplied compiler is not that good ), but the GNU people cannot cover all the special cases. I once posted an article on a similar topic where I concluded: "if you want GCC on more platforms and more compatible to specific environments, sponsor the FSF." This is still true. Not SGI is wrong, but FSF/GNU has not enough resources (IMO) to keep up with the latest development. b) On extensions: if something in a standard (like COFF or ELF) is insufficient or broken, fix it or extend the standard. Otherwise you end up with inferior stuff. What do you (Peter M.) want? Top tools like WorkShop, or just crummy 'dbx'. Opinions are mine and so on. Martin -- +---------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ |Martin Knoblauch | Silicon Graphics GmbH | |Application Support | Am Hochacker 3 - Technopark | |Silicon Graphics Computer Systems| D-85630 Grasbrunn-Neukeferloh, FRG| | | Phone: (+int) 89 46108-179 or -0 | | | Fax: (+int) 89 46108-190 (-222) | +---------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ |Network: <knobi@sgi.com> | V-Mail: 5-8935 | M/S: IMU-315 | +---------------------------------------------------------------------+
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<2cfgm5$788@hercules.neu.sgi.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmd.de!xlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!spool.mu.edu!olivea!sgigate.sgi.com!odin!hercules.neu.sgi.com!knobi.munich.sgi.com!knobiReferences:
<PRZEMEK.93Nov10161559@rrdbartok.nist.gov> <MUTS.93Nov13001723@compi.hobby.nl>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 11318c,b65bc049388cd23 X-Google-Attributes: gid11318c,public X-Google-Thread: 100159,b65bc049388cd23 X-Google-Attributes: gid100159,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1993-11-18 04:32:07 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmd.de!xlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!spool.mu.edu!olivea!sgigate.sgi.com!odin!hercules.neu.sgi.com!knobi.munich.sgi.com!knobi From: knobi@knobi.munich.sgi.com (Martin Knoblauch) Newsgroups: comp.sys.sgi.misc,gnu.gcc.help Subject: Re: WorkShop won't work with non-SGI compilers? Date: 18 Nov 1993 09:53:09 GMT Organization: Silicon Graphics, Inc. Lines: 46 Distribution: world Message-ID: <2cfgm5$788@hercules.neu.sgi.com> References: <PRZEMEK.93Nov10161559@rrdbartok.nist.gov> <MUTS.93Nov13001723@compi.hobby.nl> NNTP-Posting-Host: knobi.munich.sgi.com