🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Thread View: comp.sys.sgi.misc
2 messages
2 total messages Started by Yuukigousei Fri, 08 Sep 1995 00:00
What's the aimes of patchSG0000556.c++_dev_sw.c++ ?
#361
Author: Yuukigousei
Date: Fri, 08 Sep 1995 00:00
22 lines
1492 bytes
I have a question about the following patches.

patchSG0000556.c++_dev_sw  07/26/95  C++ Software
patchSG0000556.c++_dev_sw.c++  07/26/95  C++ Compiler

What are the aims of these?

There are some incompatibility problems in running our C++ program.
The executable code made by C++ with the above patches runs fine,
however, the executable made by C++ on another indigo2 without the
patches gives wrong results.
We are also curious that the size of the executables are different,
the former one is almost one third of the latter though the source
programs are completely the same.  In addition either one is not
stripped.  That's why I am suspecting the presense of the patches.

Any pointers will be welcome.  Thank you.
-- 
 ****    Tetsuhiko TAKABATAKE, Sumitomo Chemical  ***
 *      Organic Synthesis Research Laboratory    *
  *    Tel: 0726-92-5326, Fax: 0726-92-5359     * 
****  takahata@sumitomo-chem.co.jp              ***
Re: What's the aimes of patchSG0000556.c++_dev_sw.c++ ?
#362
Author: Shankar Unni
Date: Sat, 09 Sep 1995 00:00
33 lines
2054 bytes
Yuukigousei (takahata@ohsun01.sumitomo-chem.co.jp) wrote:

> I have a question about the following patches.
> patchSG0000556.c++_dev_sw  07/26/95  C++ Software
> patchSG0000556.c++_dev_sw.c++  07/26/95  C++ Compiler
> What are the aims of these?

To fix bugs? Or are you referring to some higher purpose?  Many, many bugs
have been fixed in patch 556. Read the release notes for the patch (try
"grelnotes patchSG0000556").

> There are some incompatibility problems in running our C++ program.
> The executable code made by C++ with the above patches runs fine,
> however, the executable made by C++ on another indigo2 without the
> patches gives wrong results.

No surprise - if that other Indigo2 didn't have the patch, chances are that
you are running afoul of a bug that's been fixed in patch 556.

> We are also curious that the size of the executables are different,
> the former one is almost one third of the latter though the source
> programs are completely the same.

One-third?! Wow. There was this bug in patch 170 (an early predecessor of
patch 556) which caused some bloat, but nothing like this (it was more like
5%).

Are you *SURE* you compiled exactly the same files with exactly the same
options (i.e. -g .vs. -O, etc)?
--
Shankar Unni				E-Mail:	shankar@sgi.com
Silicon Graphics Inc.			Phone:	+1-415-390-2072
URL:	http://reality.sgi.com/employees/shankar
Thread Navigation

This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.

Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.

Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.

Back to All Threads