Article View: comp.sys.sun.hardware
Article #2248Re: Performance of Sparc Classic?
From: Phillip Fayers
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 13:45
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 13:45
41 lines
2678 bytes
2678 bytes
In article <18471@autodesk.COM> marc@autodesk.com writes: | |In article 51917@seismo.CSS.GOV, dsc@seismo.CSS.GOV (taste is the enemy |of art) writes: | |>Model SPECint92 SPECfp92 MIPS MFLOPS Cache* Contexts |>----- --------- -------- ---- ------ ------ -------- |>IPX 21.8 21.5 28.5 4.2 64 8 |>2 21.8 22.8 28.5 4.2 64 16 |>Classic 26.4 21.0 59.1 4.6 6 64 |>LX 26.4 21.0 59.1 4.6 6 64 |> |>* in KBs - cache is unified unless marked as data/instruction. | |Take careful note of the cache size on the Classic/LX. One thing that |has been become obvious to us here is that the IPX and SS2 perform |significantly better (in some case 2 or 3 times) on large programs with |poor cache locality. Benchmarks don't always tell the whole story... One other thing to note is that the Classic and LX have a faster path to main memory than the SPARCstation 2 so they should be able to live with a smaller cache. The Classic/LX use 60ns SIMMs and pull 64bits at a time from two 32bit SIMMs which means that it accesses memory more than twice as fast as an SS2 (80ns 32bit). From a talk at the UK Unix User Group/ Sun UK User Group New Year conference (1993) I found out that the SPARCstation 2 takes 25 clock cycles to fetch from main memory when it has a chache miss! The Classic with its Tsunami chipset (a much nicer name than MicroSPARC IMHO) doesn't have such a large miss penalty. Looking at the figures above I would say that the SPECfp92 benchmarks are unlikely to fit in a 6kbyte cache so comparing the SS2 and Classic by the SPECfp92 numbers should give you quite a good comparison. -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Phillip Fayers JANET : fayers@uk.ac.cardiff Sun admin/support/programming INTERNET : fayers@cardiff.ac.uk University of Wales, College of Cardiff phone : 0222 874000 ext 5282 Department of Physics and Astronomy P.O. Box 913, Cardiff, CF2 3QD. -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<20115.9301261345@thor.cf.ac.uk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!ferkel.ucsb.edu!taco!gatech!paladin.american.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!spool.mu.edu!agate!doc.ic.ac.uk!uknet!cf-cm!newsReferences:
<51917@seismo.CSS.GOV> <18471@autodesk.COM>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!ferkel.ucsb.edu!taco!gatech!paladin.american.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!spool.mu.edu!agate!doc.ic.ac.uk!uknet!cf-cm!news From: spxpmf@thor.cf.ac.uk (Phillip Fayers) Newsgroups: comp.sys.sun.hardware Subject: Re: Performance of Sparc Classic? Message-ID: <20115.9301261345@thor.cf.ac.uk> Date: 26 Jan 93 13:45:01 GMT References: <51917@seismo.CSS.GOV> <18471@autodesk.COM> Sender: news@cm.cf.ac.uk (Network News System) Organization: Physics Dept. University of Wales, Cardiff Lines: 41 X-Mailer: Cardiff Computing Maths PP Mail Open News Gateway