Article View: comp.sys.sun.hardware
Article #2429Re: Sun Ultra 60 or not?
From: DoN. Nichols
Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2008 04:25
Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2008 04:25
34 lines
2566 bytes
2566 bytes
On 2008-06-30, terryc <newssixspam-spam@woa.com.au> wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 04:53:39 +0000, DoN. Nichols wrote:
>
>> On 2008-06-29, terryc <newssixspam-spam@woa.com.au> wrote:
>>
>> [ ... ]
>>
>>> My 2c is that if you are going to go out and spend $$$ to buy hardware,
>>> then buy X86 system hardware rather than sun stuff. Especially if you have
>>> some hardware skills and can buy yumcha x86 stuff. The parts will always
>>> be reuseable in other systems.
>>
>> Tell that to my collection of ISA cards which won't work in the
>> PCI slots of newer Intel boxen. And what is the meaning of "yumcha"?
>> I've never encountered it before. And for that matter -- what about the
>> ST-506 interface disks from the old PCs? You have to find a controller
>> which will fit in a PCI slot and talk to the disk on anything made since
>> the IDE interface came into common use. And good luck fining one of
>> *those* with a PCI connector. :-)
>
> Yawn, you left out your collection of S100 cards.
That's because I don't *have* any. Now I do have a few cards
for my Altair 680b, but while it uses the same 100-pin connector, the
offset is different, and the wiring is vastly different (and a lot more
logical than the S-100 is. :-)
Enjoy,
DoN.
--
Email: <dnichols@d-and-d.com> | Voice (all times): (703) 938-4564
(too) near Washington D.C. | http://www.d-and-d.com/dnichols/DoN.html
--- Black Holes are where God is dividing by zero ---
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<slrng6jcf5.t35.dnichols@Katana.d-and-d.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!out02a.usenetserver.com!news.usenetserver.com!in01.usenetserver.com!news.usenetserver.com!spln!extra.newsguy.com!newsp.newsguy.com!news2References:
<76d8c086-209e-4734-a82f-25ce5889d180@34g2000hsh.googlegroups.com> <g45430$mcq$3@yoda.apana.org.au> <pan.2008.06.29.10.57.09.50630@woa.com.au> <slrng6gpn4.sb5.dnichols@Katana.d-and-d.com> <pan.2008.06.30.14.02.17.11063@woa.com.au>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: f4671,10c7b14af02e3ae4 X-Google-Thread: 113606,ffa6cd82a0cca71c X-Google-Thread: 10d053,ffa6cd82a0cca71c X-Google-Attributes: gidf4671,gid113606,gid10d053,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!out02a.usenetserver.com!news.usenetserver.com!in01.usenetserver.com!news.usenetserver.com!spln!extra.newsguy.com!newsp.newsguy.com!news2 From: "DoN. Nichols" <dnichols@d-and-d.com> Newsgroups: comp.sys.sun.hardware,uk.comp.sys.sun,aus.computers.sun Subject: Re: Sun Ultra 60 or not? Date: 1 Jul 2008 04:25:53 GMT Organization: D and D Data Lines: 34 Message-ID: <slrng6jcf5.t35.dnichols@Katana.d-and-d.com> References: <76d8c086-209e-4734-a82f-25ce5889d180@34g2000hsh.googlegroups.com> <g45430$mcq$3@yoda.apana.org.au> <pan.2008.06.29.10.57.09.50630@woa.com.au> <slrng6gpn4.sb5.dnichols@Katana.d-and-d.com> <pan.2008.06.30.14.02.17.11063@woa.com.au> NNTP-Posting-Host: p24d1bfbfff000000dafb82530e6bf94af7c4d887dfba85ee.newsdawg.com User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.1pl1 (SunOS)