Article View: comp.sys.sun.hardware
Article #2463Re: When was the SPARC 20 introduced and discontinued?
From: Dave
Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2005 12:41
Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2005 12:41
29 lines
2662 bytes
2662 bytes
Kralizec Craig wrote: >>not so sure you are always right here, one problem is SUNs >>NVRAM with built-in battery, this is a problematic construction >>i think. > > > Why? Just replace the NVRAM and the machine is good to go again once the new > NVRAM is programmed. > > Craig. > Sooner or later I expect those chips will stop being manufactured. Then you will have more of a problem, although people have opened them up to put an external battery. I would not do it now, as you can buy the chips, but I can't see a chip with such limited storage being made forever. That said, even die hards like me will probably scrap the SS20s before then, although I have a certain fondness for that machine . I got one once when some "ram raiders" thrashed them all at work and it was an insurance write-off. But whilst I was pretty sure ram could have fitted in the slot, it was too expensive for me to risk it. I managed to borrow some ram overnight from a friend who was a system admin at a polytechnic, but then we found the CPU had gone too. He was going to return the RAM, then borrow a CPU & RAM the next day. But his mum died, so he had other things on his mind and I could not afford to buy the bits on the off-chance it worked. So it got sold for more (in a non-working state) than I suspect my U80 with 4x450 and 4GB is worth now!
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<436b570a@212.67.96.135>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!newsfeed.news2me.com!nntp1.phx1.gblx.net!nntp.gblx.net!nntp.gblx.net!212.67.96.135!213.78.42.15References:
<43567331@212.67.96.135> <4356841d$0$11069$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl> <4356a5ef@212.67.96.135> <Pine.SOL.4.58.0510191425000.13005@excalibur> <4357c25c$0$8834$edfadb0f@dread14.news.tele.dk> <dk3qvr$i3g$2@yoda.apana.org.au>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: f4671,6fa87c562c74d614 X-Google-Thread: 10d053,1411f72293ee099b X-Google-Thread: f6653,1411f72293ee099b X-Google-Thread: 113606,ed66e2b41236896f X-Google-Attributes: gidf4671,gid10d053,gidf6653,gid113606,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2005 12:41:46 +0000 From: Dave <nospam@nowhere.com> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; SunOS sun4u; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20041117 X-Accept-Language: en, en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.sys.sun.hardware,aus.computers.sun,comp.sys.sun.misc,uk.comp.sys.sun Subject: Re: When was the SPARC 20 introduced and discontinued? References: <43567331@212.67.96.135> <4356841d$0$11069$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl> <4356a5ef@212.67.96.135> <Pine.SOL.4.58.0510191425000.13005@excalibur> <4357c25c$0$8834$edfadb0f@dread14.news.tele.dk> <dk3qvr$i3g$2@yoda.apana.org.au> In-Reply-To: <dk3qvr$i3g$2@yoda.apana.org.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit NNTP-Posting-Host: 213.78.42.15 Message-ID: <436b570a@212.67.96.135> X-Trace: 4 Nov 2005 12:41:46 GMT, 213.78.42.15 Lines: 31 Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!newsfeed.news2me.com!nntp1.phx1.gblx.net!nntp.gblx.net!nntp.gblx.net!212.67.96.135!213.78.42.15