Re: SS10: Two SM51s or one SM81?

Article View: comp.sys.sun.hardware

Article #2723

Back to comp.sys.sun.hardware Previous Next

#2723

From: Casper H.S. Dik - Network Securi...
Date: Sun, 05 Dec 1999 00:00

17 lines
1152 bytes

[[ PLEASE DON'T SEND ME EMAIL COPIES OF POSTINGS ]]

cd@lios.apana.org.au (Craig Dewick) writes:

>I'm not sure if Sun endorses the use of SM-81's in Sparc 10's and 20's...
>Some say they do, some say they don't.


They don't.   (The Field engineer's handbook only lists them for
the sun4d servers)

Casper
--
Expressed in this posting are my opinions.  They are in no way related
to opinions held by my employer, Sun Microsystems.
Statements on Sun products included here are not gospel and may
be fiction rather than truth.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <82dfre$gj3$1@new-usenet.uk.sun.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <3847F703.ECD84798@gmx.de> <82c69t$e20$1@lios.apana.org.au>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f4671,9862824bf7df5fa5
X-Google-Attributes: gidf4671,public
X-Google-Thread: 10d053,4097471711a4c611
X-Google-Attributes: gid10d053,public
From: Casper.Dik@Holland.Sun.Com (Casper H.S. Dik - Network Security Engineer)
Subject: Re: SS10: Two SM51s or one SM81?
Date: 1999/12/05
Message-ID: <82dfre$gj3$1@new-usenet.uk.sun.com>
X-Deja-AN: 556830824
References: <3847F703.ECD84798@gmx.de> <82c69t$e20$1@lios.apana.org.au>
Mail-Copies-To: never
Organization: Sun Microsystems, Netherlands
Newsgroups: comp.sys.sun.hardware,aus.computers.sun

Reply to Parent Message