Article View: comp.sys.sun.hardware
Article #3018Re: SM61 vs. SM71 - Why such a price difference?
From: Niklas Edmundsson
Date: Fri, 04 Sep 1998 00:00
Date: Fri, 04 Sep 1998 00:00
59 lines
3598 bytes
3598 bytes
In comp.sys.sun.hardware Craig Dewick <cdewick@lios.apana.org.au> wrote:
> 4/6xx boards can run SunOS 5.6 (aka Solaris 2.6) with some kernel fiddling
> to remove the machine type check. There's no VME support as of 5.6, so it
> makes a 4/6xx into a very capable single-board Sun-4m machine with lots of
> Sbus slots. And one good thing is that 4/6xx's use standard 4 meg, 30 pin
> parity SIMM's.
A funny thing: The VME memory-boards work. They show up as vmemem, so
they haven't hacked-away the VME-support completely...
BTW, The SIMM:s on the main-board must be 80ns (which means 70ns PC ..)
4MB or 16MB, and the expansion-boards can be config:ed for 80ns and
100ns 1MB, 4MB or 16MB. This means you can put 2.5GB memory in the
machine, rather impressive not to mention the sight of 160 SIMM:s ;)
> Another limitation, besides the lack of VME support (but who really needs
> that these days anyway?), is that you can't use the older types of Mbus CPU
> modules since SunOS 5.6 dropped support for them too. Things like the SM-5x
> and SM-6x modules do generally work (not all variants of each though), but
> not the older SM-100's.
They show up as TI,TMS390Z55 (or something similar) in dmesg &
/var/adm/messages. I think the output from module-info (or what it's
called) in the PROM is the same.
> I don't however have a record of what needs to be done with the kernel to
> disable the 4/6xx system checking routine. Does anyone have a saved copy of
> the news article(s) which detailed what to do to make SunOS 5.6 work on
> 4/6xx boards?
Use adb -w /platform/sun4m/kernel/unix
Somewhere near startup+0x74c it should read 'call halt'. Change that
line to 'nop' instead.
It works real well, but it's a pain when you forget to do it again when
you apply some kernel-patch...
> >Solaris 2.7 will not support some older hardware, anyone that knows more
> >precise ?
> I presume the Sun-4c will be dropped, since they are getting very old now
> (but still extremely useful) compared to all the Ultrasparc models being
> released.
Well, since Computer-clubs never gets new hardware for free, I'd rather
see that they kept the support for old hardware. But since they still
are shipping patches to Solaris 2.4, we survive ;)
--
/Nikke - SysAdmin, Academic Computer Club, Ume� University, Sweden
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Niklas Edmundsson, Admin @ {ing,acc}.umu.se | nikke@ing.umu.se
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
--- There's ALWAYS one more bug! ---
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<6sp9r9$kb6$1@studium.student.umu.se>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<slrn6un9qt.5nl.jay@wiley.sb.west.net> <6shbnl$o4o$1@moek.pir.net> <6shrl3$2sb$2@nntp2.ba.best.com> <6shv1h$pb$1@moek.pir.net> <6sj6hs$nhc$1@studium.student.umu.se> <6sllrj$ggd$1@lios.apana.org.au>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII X-Google-Thread: f4671,9eba9ec5846b4694 X-Google-Attributes: gidf4671,public X-Google-Thread: f88e1,3b8c1b5ce1359ba6 X-Google-Attributes: gidf88e1,public X-Google-Thread: 10d053,3b8c1b5ce1359ba6 X-Google-Attributes: gid10d053,public From: Niklas Edmundsson <nikke+spam@ing.umu.se> Subject: Re: SM61 vs. SM71 - Why such a price difference? Date: 1998/09/04 Message-ID: <6sp9r9$kb6$1@studium.student.umu.se> X-Deja-AN: 387912937 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit References: <slrn6un9qt.5nl.jay@wiley.sb.west.net> <6shbnl$o4o$1@moek.pir.net> <6shrl3$2sb$2@nntp2.ba.best.com> <6shv1h$pb$1@moek.pir.net> <6sj6hs$nhc$1@studium.student.umu.se> <6sllrj$ggd$1@lios.apana.org.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Organization: Ume� Universitet Mime-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.sys.sun.hardware,aus.computers.sun,alt.sys.sun