🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.sys.sun.hardware
Article #3048

Re: 3-chip 30-pin parity SIMM's in Sparc 1, 1+ and 2 machines

#3048
From: George Robbins
Date: Mon, 01 Jun 1998 00:00
45 lines
2825 bytes
In article <Pine.GSO.3.96.980530071603.697A-100000@lios.apana.org.au>, Craig Dewick wrote:
>
>I've received a batch of 3-chip 30-pin parity SIMM's which I'm going to use
>to build up a couple of sun-4c machines to 64 meg of RAM (they currently
>have no RAM fitted). The SIMM's were sold to me as suitable for sun-4c
>machines by a regular advertiser in the newsgroups.
>
>I've noticed problems with these SIMM's. They pass the POST RAM test fine
>(usually), but when starting the kernel it fails with a watchdog reset.
>I've tried swapping banks around, swapping entire banks out of the
>machine, etc. all with mostly the same result. 
>
>Sometimes the machines will boot, but fail soon after. 

Sounds like it could be a refresh problem.  The x4 devices probably
have different refresh requirements.

>I've noticed that the RAM chips (marked as made by Mitsubishi) are not the
>same speeds, which seems odd. The two 4-bit devices are 70 ns, while the
>single-bit device is 60 ns. I don't see this as being a problem in itself,
>since I'm suspecting the capacitive loading resulting from the SIMM's being
>3-chip instead of 9-chip is what's upsetting the DRAM controllers.
>
>3-chip SIMM's have traditionally been seen, afiak, as a bad idea for early
>Sparcstations. 

A "your milage may vary" issue...

>I did try swapping out all the 3-chip SIMM's for some 9-chip ones I have
>spare from another system, and they worked without a hitch, so perhaps the
>old adage has come out of hiding to show it's still applicable?
>
>What are your opinions about this? I don't think the supplier of the SIMM's
>will object to them being returned if there is a genuine problem since I'm a
>regular customer. 8-)

Usually it's adequte to say that they didn't work in your application
and trade for 9-chip ones.  It can be more of a battle if your supplier
had to special order or doesn't have 9-chip versions to exchange.

--
George Robbins - now working for      work:  grr@netaxs.com
Net Access - seemed like the best     uucp:  ...!uunet!netaxs.com!grr
way to help improve service...        play:  grr@tharsis.com
Technical Details
Message-ID: <slrn6n5d26.iol.grr@shandakor.tharsis.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <Pine.GSO.3.96.980530071603.697A-100000@lios.apana.org.au>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f4671,495e04127a63dcd0
X-Google-Attributes: gidf4671,public
X-Google-Thread: f88e1,495e04127a63dcd0
X-Google-Attributes: gidf88e1,public
X-Google-Thread: 10d053,495e04127a63dcd0
X-Google-Attributes: gid10d053,public
From: grr@shandakor.tharsis.com (George Robbins)
Subject: Re: 3-chip 30-pin parity SIMM's in Sparc 1, 1+ and 2 machines
Date: 1998/06/01
Message-ID: <slrn6n5d26.iol.grr@shandakor.tharsis.com>
X-Deja-AN: 358451470
References: <Pine.GSO.3.96.980530071603.697A-100000@lios.apana.org.au>
Organization: George's Pet Unix System
Newsgroups: comp.sys.sun.hardware,aus.computers.sun,alt.sys.sun