Article View: comp.sys.sun.hardware
Article #3160Re: Terminator; "passive" or "active" that's the question ?
From: J.P.M. Theuws
Date: Thu, 15 May 1997 00:00
Date: Thu, 15 May 1997 00:00
55 lines
2895 bytes
2895 bytes
Craig Dewick wrote: > > In <33797DC9.5A54@mailhost.km-mhm.comp.philips.com> "J.P.M. Theuws" <theuwsj@mailhost.km-mhm.comp.philips.com> writes: > > >Does anyone know the exact differance between a "passive" and a "active" > >terminator ? > > A traditional SCSI terminator has a series of resistor dividers made from > 220 and 330 ohm resistive elements. For a single signal line, the circuit > is like this: > > +5v -------+-------- > * > * > data ------+--------- > * > * > gnd -------+--------- > > Each vertical pair of asterisks represents a single passive resistor. I > can't remember if the 220 ohm or the 330 ohm sits between +5v and the > signal line though. 8-) > > Lots of these in a single assembly form a normal 'passive' terminator. > It's easy to see why it's termed a passiver terminator because the voltage > divider never changes it's parameters regardless of the electrical > conditions of the SCSI cable. For longer cables especially, passive > termination can often cause more problems than it solves. > > An 'active' terminator is basically an automatically adjusting version of > the passive terminator, and goes a long way to compensating for signal > degradation in longer cables and in cable assemblies that stretch the > electrical specs close to the limits described in the SCSI 'standards'. > > >And does SUN always make use of a "active" terminator on the SCSI-bus... > > Older machines like the Sun-3's and early Sparc-based models all used > passive terminators, but I'm not sure about current and recent generation > machines which have SCSI controllers integrated into big ASIC's with other > major hardware 'components'. I suspect active termination is almost the > norm now, especially with SCSI-2 and later interfaces. > > Regards, > > Craig. > > -- > Sun Ripened Kernels - http://www.zeta.org.au/~craig/srk.html > Surplus and pre-loved Sun Microsystems equipment. > Based in Sydney, Australia. Operated by > Craig Dewick - craig@zeta.org.au - http://www.zeta.org.au/~craig Thanks Craig for the expanation. Hans Theuws
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<337B0E23.3AF6@mailhost.km-mhm.comp.philips.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<33797DC9.5A54@mailhost.km-mhm.comp.philips.com> <5lc2un$717$1@godzilla.zeta.org.au>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f4671,7a5dc140f68569af X-Google-Attributes: gidf4671,public X-Google-Thread: 10d053,58184c55311131cc X-Google-Attributes: gid10d053,public From: "J.P.M. Theuws" <theuwsj@mailhost.km-mhm.comp.philips.com> Subject: Re: Terminator; "passive" or "active" that's the question ? Date: 1997/05/15 Message-ID: <337B0E23.3AF6@mailhost.km-mhm.comp.philips.com> X-Deja-AN: 241683504 References: <33797DC9.5A54@mailhost.km-mhm.comp.philips.com> <5lc2un$717$1@godzilla.zeta.org.au> Organization: Philips, MH&M Reply-To: theuwsj@mailhost.km-mhm.comp.philips.com Newsgroups: comp.sys.sun.hardware,aus.computers.sun