🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.sys.sun.hardware
Article #3162

Re: Sun Sparc 1+ Memory Question

#3162
From: James Lockwood
Date: Wed, 21 May 1997 00:00
19 lines
1387 bytes
Craig Dewick (craig@zeta.org.au) wrote:
> In <01bc659b$c3ebd480$4d8a61cf@ntserver40> <stank@dsm.fordham.edu> writes:

> >I know that the 1+ has 16 30 pin slots.  Does anyone know if the SIMMs need
> >to be true parity SIMMs? And what about the speed?

> They should be true-parity SIMM's. As for speed, 80 ns or faster is fine
> as long as you don't mix speeds within banks. 

The SS1 and SS1+ are specced as requiring 100ns or faster SIMMs, the SS2
required 80ns or faster.

-James

=============================================================================
James D. Lockwood                 College of Engineering and Computer Science
Unix System Administrator              California State University Northridge
james.lockwood@ecs.csun.edu
Technical Details
Message-ID: <33833ba0.0@130.166.1.64>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <01bc659b$c3ebd480$4d8a61cf@ntserver40> <5lugp5$ge2$1@godzilla.zeta.org.au>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f4671,1acce76dc60c9c38
X-Google-Attributes: gidf4671,public
X-Google-Thread: 10d053,22d20352a13dd9f2
X-Google-Attributes: gid10d053,public
From: lockwood@ecs.csun.edu (James Lockwood)
Subject: Re: Sun Sparc 1+ Memory Question
Date: 1997/05/21
Message-ID: <33833ba0.0@130.166.1.64>
X-Deja-AN: 242897737
References: <01bc659b$c3ebd480$4d8a61cf@ntserver40> <5lugp5$ge2$1@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
Followup-To: comp.sys.sun.hardware,aus.computers.sun
Organization: California State University, Northridge
Newsgroups: comp.sys.sun.hardware,aus.computers.sun