Article View: comp.sys.sun.hardware
Article #3162Re: Sun Sparc 1+ Memory Question
From: James Lockwood
Date: Wed, 21 May 1997 00:00
Date: Wed, 21 May 1997 00:00
19 lines
1387 bytes
1387 bytes
Craig Dewick (craig@zeta.org.au) wrote: > In <01bc659b$c3ebd480$4d8a61cf@ntserver40> <stank@dsm.fordham.edu> writes: > >I know that the 1+ has 16 30 pin slots. Does anyone know if the SIMMs need > >to be true parity SIMMs? And what about the speed? > They should be true-parity SIMM's. As for speed, 80 ns or faster is fine > as long as you don't mix speeds within banks. The SS1 and SS1+ are specced as requiring 100ns or faster SIMMs, the SS2 required 80ns or faster. -James ============================================================================= James D. Lockwood College of Engineering and Computer Science Unix System Administrator California State University Northridge james.lockwood@ecs.csun.edu
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<33833ba0.0@130.166.1.64>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<01bc659b$c3ebd480$4d8a61cf@ntserver40> <5lugp5$ge2$1@godzilla.zeta.org.au>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f4671,1acce76dc60c9c38 X-Google-Attributes: gidf4671,public X-Google-Thread: 10d053,22d20352a13dd9f2 X-Google-Attributes: gid10d053,public From: lockwood@ecs.csun.edu (James Lockwood) Subject: Re: Sun Sparc 1+ Memory Question Date: 1997/05/21 Message-ID: <33833ba0.0@130.166.1.64> X-Deja-AN: 242897737 References: <01bc659b$c3ebd480$4d8a61cf@ntserver40> <5lugp5$ge2$1@godzilla.zeta.org.au> Followup-To: comp.sys.sun.hardware,aus.computers.sun Organization: California State University, Northridge Newsgroups: comp.sys.sun.hardware,aus.computers.sun