Article View: comp.sys.sun.hardware
Article #3501Re: RESPONSE: What size is a 17" monitor really ? buyer accuses fraud. HELP!
From: Dave Olson
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 1994 07:47
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 1994 07:47
28 lines
2825 bytes
2825 bytes
In <Co2v1E.B6I@acsu.buffalo.edu> kalisiak@cs.buffalo.edu (Chris Kalisiak) writes: | >No, he is right, for some mfgr's and some disks. | | Only those unscrupulous vendors whom try to make their products sound | larger than they actually are. Kinda like tweaking SPECmarks, I suppose. You can look at that way if you want, but all of the are quite honest and clear about it. At *least* the following vendors do this on their 3.5" drives (some did it on 5 1/4", but fewer): IBM, Seagate, Maxtor, Conner I'm pretty sure that Quantum and HP do also, but I'm not sure. That's a pretty high percentage of drives shipped. I'ver forgotten what the Japanese vendors (Hitachi, Fujitsu, Toshiba) are doing these days. | Right. The only thing that is done in powers of two are things directly | related to computers, such as memory and disk. Not many disks any more. Mind you, I agree the change is confusing, and I didn't like it initially either, but I've adapted. You don't have to like it, but you had better get used to it. -- The most beautiful things in the world are | Dave Olson those from which all excess weight has been | Silicon Graphics removed. -Henry Ford | olson@sgi.com
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<2oava2$ri1@gazette.esd.sgi.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmd.de!newsserver.jvnc.net!howland.reston.ans.net!darwin.sura.net!sgiblab!sgigate.sgi.com!gazette.esd.sgi.com!anchor!olsonReferences:
<2ll5ps$35v@cnj.digex.com> <1994Mar9.165029.14199@hellgate.utah.edu> <1994Mar12.072644.2946@cabell.vcu.edu> <gfzLe#b@quack.kfu.com> <2o1oam$3f5@news.u.washington.edu> <1994Apr8.224856.25548@rosevax.rosemount.com> <2o6rsl$8df@crl2.crl.com> <1994Apr10.183921.27790@rosevax.rosemount.com> <2oai4e$nck@gazette.esd.sgi.com> <Co2v1E.B6I@acsu.buffalo.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 102533,aa195a126c39faf9 X-Google-Attributes: gid102533,public X-Google-Thread: f4671,aa195a126c39faf9 X-Google-Attributes: gidf4671,public X-Google-Thread: fa751,aa195a126c39faf9 X-Google-Attributes: gidfa751,public X-Google-Thread: f4bb2,aa195a126c39faf9 X-Google-Attributes: gidf4bb2,public X-Google-Thread: fc721,aa195a126c39faf9 X-Google-Attributes: gidfc721,public X-Google-Thread: 10d752,aa195a126c39faf9 X-Google-Attributes: gid10d752,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-04-11 00:47:14 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmd.de!newsserver.jvnc.net!howland.reston.ans.net!darwin.sura.net!sgiblab!sgigate.sgi.com!gazette.esd.sgi.com!anchor!olson From: olson@anchor.esd.sgi.com (Dave Olson) Newsgroups: comp.sys.sun.hardware,misc.forsale.computers.workstation,comp.sys.sgi.hardware,biz.dec.workstations,comp.sys.hp.hardware,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.video Subject: Re: RESPONSE: What size is a 17" monitor really ? buyer accuses fraud. HELP! Date: 11 Apr 1994 07:47:14 GMT Organization: Silicon Graphics, Inc. Mountain View, CA Lines: 28 Message-ID: <2oava2$ri1@gazette.esd.sgi.com> References: <2ll5ps$35v@cnj.digex.com> <1994Mar9.165029.14199@hellgate.utah.edu> <1994Mar12.072644.2946@cabell.vcu.edu> <gfzLe#b@quack.kfu.com> <2o1oam$3f5@news.u.washington.edu> <1994Apr8.224856.25548@rosevax.rosemount.com> <2o6rsl$8df@crl2.crl.com> <1994Apr10.183921.27790@rosevax.rosemount.com> <2oai4e$nck@gazette.esd.sgi.com> <Co2v1E.B6I@acsu.buffalo.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: anchor.esd.sgi.com