🚀 go-pugleaf

mcgrew@topaz.rutgers.edu (Charles) writes:
>Concerning setuid-ing fingerd to make it not run as root, can anyone think
>of a reason of not setuid-ing finger to 'who'?  That seems to be a fairly
>inoffensive uid...
>
>Charles

Making fingerd setuid to some 'innocent' user won't help.

The man page for execve states: If a program is setuid to a non-super-user,
but is executed when the real uid is 'root', then the program has the
powers of a super-user as well.

If you want fingerd to run as a unpriviliged process add a line
setuid(some-uid); to the source.

Casper Dik.

Casper H.S. Dik
University of Amsterdam     |		      dik@uva.uucp
The Netherlands             |                 ...!uunet!mcvax!uva!dik

[[ C'mon people, this really is a non-problem.  The official "worm-killer"
patch distributed by Sun (and available in the Sun-Spots archives) has the
entire source to fingerd in it.  The entire, recompilable, C source code.
So go stick a line in the source that does a setuid(X) for some value X.
--wnl ]]