Re: damaged /usr partition

Article View: comp.sys.sun

Article #10265

#10265

From: E. Scott Menter
Date: Sat, 14 Jan 1989 00:06

15 lines
1202 bytes

> This has got to be the thing I dislike most about 4.0. In order for your
> system to boot, it is now totally dependent on two partitions instead of
> one, so there are two crucial points of filesystem failure (three if you
> count swap). Yuck.

Well, this has been said before, but the point is that /usr should be
mounted read-only under 4.x.  As a result, you should more or less never
have a trashed /usr partition.  And, I find it a nice thing to have under
single user (never did like editing system files with "ed" 8^).

Scott Menter
Sr. Network Administrator
Shearson Lehman Hutton
escott@shearson.com
uucp!slcpi!escott

Technical Details

Message-ID: <8901092116.AA12273@poseidon.lehman.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!ames!mailrus!cornell!uw-beaver!rice!sun-spots-request

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!ames!mailrus!cornell!uw-beaver!rice!sun-spots-request
From: slcpi!poseidon!escott@uunet.uu.net (E. Scott Menter)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.sun
Subject: Re: damaged /usr partition
Message-ID: <8901092116.AA12273@poseidon.lehman.com>
Date: 14 Jan 89 00:06:38 GMT
Sender: usenet@rice.edu
Organization: Prime Computervision, Penn St, Amersham, England
Lines: 15
Approved: Sun-Spots@rice.edu
Original-Date: Mon, 9 Jan 89 16:16:38 EST
X-Sun-Spots-Digest: Volume 7, Issue 102, message 11 of 18
X-Issue-Reference: v7n92