Re: Publisher vs FrameMaker

Article View: comp.sys.sun

Article #10275

#10275

From: Brian Whittaker
Date: Sat, 14 Jan 1989 03:27

15 lines
1369 bytes

dela@ee.rochester.edu (Del Armstrong) writes:
>	- We ruled out Interleaf due to it's interface. Interleaf takes over
>	your entire screen, prohibiting the use of SunTool based applications
>	while running Interleaf. 

Just to set the record straight (or up to date) - we have Interleaf 3.0
and it does run quite happily *under* SunView allowing full access to
SunTool based applications while running Interleaf.  I'm not sure of the
details, but I think it requires SunOs 3.2 or later (don't know about
4.0).  I'm also told they recommend at least 24M of swap space, but we've
been using it happily with only 12M.

Brian Whittaker, Prime Computervision, Amersham, HP7 0PX, UK
bwhittak@cvedg.prime.com
bwhittak@uk.co.cv.edg                  +44 494 714771 x 304

Technical Details

Message-ID: <149@libra.edg.cv.co.uk>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!ames!mailrus!cornell!uw-beaver!rice!sun-spots-request

References: <2319@kalliope.rice.edu> <1689@valhalla.ee.rochester.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!ames!mailrus!cornell!uw-beaver!rice!sun-spots-request
From: bwhittak@libra.uucp (Brian Whittaker)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.sun
Subject: Re: Publisher vs FrameMaker
Message-ID: <149@libra.edg.cv.co.uk>
Date: 14 Jan 89 03:27:23 GMT
References: <2319@kalliope.rice.edu> <1689@valhalla.ee.rochester.edu>
Sender: usenet@rice.edu
Organization: Prime Computervision, Penn St, Amersham, England
Lines: 15
Approved: Sun-Spots@rice.edu
Original-Date: 6 Jan 89 17:39:37 GMT
X-Sun-Spots-Digest: Volume 7, Issue 103, message 3 of 11
X-Issue-Reference: v7n76

Reply to Parent Message